Jan
13
“All is Number”
Existence of a mathematical code in every thing is a fact. Everything can be finally brought down into numbers and studied. The way even the super computers finally work on 0 and 1. Our mind too works on similar logic.
Our Mind derives such formulas and mathematical likings to observe and distinguish things in our surroundings to make rational patterns. That is its our mind that invents these mathematical relations, a philosophy of observation, that is if five random objects are given to us…we may still derive some mathematical links between them by power of observation, like all are of same size or their size are in such and such ratio, we observe them and invents them for our benefits, accuracy and precision in making valid observations. The Object remains real, yet the mathematical linking remains a creation of mind.
Yet to invent a proper justifiable, unbiased non-hypocritical link is not always an easy algorithm. Skill and keenness to develop the ability to observe correctly is needed to be achieved and develop. Sometimes, some observations cause uncertainties.
The uncertainty leads us to invent such order where none actually exists, and in doing so we complicate and there by slow down our understanding of things that are random and natural. It is some thing to do with human mind desperately trying to justify its existence, and giving some meaning to all that is observed.
What does that means? Giving some meaning to all that is observed while there was no meaning? Or giving wrong meaning while right is different?
Or may be all such mathematical linking’s gives a different direction to our thought!
It seems like Kantian philosophy which I strictly despise.
The thing is, a rational mind if properly used without any bias and hypocrisy, and then the mathematical linking will surely provide the exact picture.
What a reasonable/rational/conscious unbiased non-hypocrite mind observes is all the reality is and nothing else.
Sometimes, to avoid the right yet hard approach to accept reason as the only guide, people starts talking of skepticism and intuitions and destiny and supernatural power and spirituality and divinity and all blah blah blah!
They start SAYING that don’t apply too much logic …follow your heart and intuition.
And that is obviously wrong, that is they are irrational libertarian, the category which is despicable and dangerous. Follow your heart… If u feel killing, kill, if u feel raping, rape!
Ridiculous it is. One must know the reason behind one’s emotions. Unreasonable emotions cause the infringing of others emotions. Like the Virginia Universities Lover Guy killed many people just for the sake of his irrational and suppressed feelings. One must understand the reasonable premises and proper attitude. To be happy is first moral, yet to keep happiness intact, one need to be rational/conscious and aware of right and wrong. One must never conflict other’s premises and freedom of individual rights.
Many times when a man engulfs himself in such webs of uncertainty and impermanence state, he becomes an easy victim of irrationalities and superstitions of the society like the mysticism, astrology, black magic etc.
Some people starts refusing the reason and practical premises of freedom and hence hurts their own right to be happy they suggests that thoughts lends itself to tangent, that is human mind has a tendency to explore many dimension of a thing or phenomenon.
They start arriving at very simple stuff …mind complicates things by exploring dimensions that don’t exist …it’s a negative momentum and dissipation of energy in multitude of direction! So they suggest that we must listen to our heart and intuition and do thing as naturally!
It is all based again on false notion that man is innately good! Fact is man is neither innately good nor bad!
All that we see both good and bad is man!
But the rational is one who has capability to refine good from bad and act accordingly!
Emotions are unstoppable they must not become feelings to act upon until the man is not exactly conscious about.
It is the right Objectivistic approach.
It is Vedic approach too.
Arya and Aanarya, Both men, but one who have developed this sense of morality and righteousness and others who have not!
To assume that all men are good is foolishness and vice versa!
Our Mind derives such formulas and mathematical likings to observe and distinguish things in our surroundings to make rational patterns. That is its our mind that invents these mathematical relations, a philosophy of observation, that is if five random objects are given to us…we may still derive some mathematical links between them by power of observation, like all are of same size or their size are in such and such ratio, we observe them and invents them for our benefits, accuracy and precision in making valid observations. The Object remains real, yet the mathematical linking remains a creation of mind.
Yet to invent a proper justifiable, unbiased non-hypocritical link is not always an easy algorithm. Skill and keenness to develop the ability to observe correctly is needed to be achieved and develop. Sometimes, some observations cause uncertainties.
The uncertainty leads us to invent such order where none actually exists, and in doing so we complicate and there by slow down our understanding of things that are random and natural. It is some thing to do with human mind desperately trying to justify its existence, and giving some meaning to all that is observed.
What does that means? Giving some meaning to all that is observed while there was no meaning? Or giving wrong meaning while right is different?
Or may be all such mathematical linking’s gives a different direction to our thought!
It seems like Kantian philosophy which I strictly despise.
The thing is, a rational mind if properly used without any bias and hypocrisy, and then the mathematical linking will surely provide the exact picture.
What a reasonable/rational/conscious unbiased non-hypocrite mind observes is all the reality is and nothing else.
Sometimes, to avoid the right yet hard approach to accept reason as the only guide, people starts talking of skepticism and intuitions and destiny and supernatural power and spirituality and divinity and all blah blah blah!
They start SAYING that don’t apply too much logic …follow your heart and intuition.
And that is obviously wrong, that is they are irrational libertarian, the category which is despicable and dangerous. Follow your heart… If u feel killing, kill, if u feel raping, rape!
Ridiculous it is. One must know the reason behind one’s emotions. Unreasonable emotions cause the infringing of others emotions. Like the Virginia Universities Lover Guy killed many people just for the sake of his irrational and suppressed feelings. One must understand the reasonable premises and proper attitude. To be happy is first moral, yet to keep happiness intact, one need to be rational/conscious and aware of right and wrong. One must never conflict other’s premises and freedom of individual rights.
Many times when a man engulfs himself in such webs of uncertainty and impermanence state, he becomes an easy victim of irrationalities and superstitions of the society like the mysticism, astrology, black magic etc.
Some people starts refusing the reason and practical premises of freedom and hence hurts their own right to be happy they suggests that thoughts lends itself to tangent, that is human mind has a tendency to explore many dimension of a thing or phenomenon.
They start arriving at very simple stuff …mind complicates things by exploring dimensions that don’t exist …it’s a negative momentum and dissipation of energy in multitude of direction! So they suggest that we must listen to our heart and intuition and do thing as naturally!
It is all based again on false notion that man is innately good! Fact is man is neither innately good nor bad!
All that we see both good and bad is man!
But the rational is one who has capability to refine good from bad and act accordingly!
Emotions are unstoppable they must not become feelings to act upon until the man is not exactly conscious about.
It is the right Objectivistic approach.
It is Vedic approach too.
Arya and Aanarya, Both men, but one who have developed this sense of morality and righteousness and others who have not!
To assume that all men are good is foolishness and vice versa!
In fact the part of us that has been rationalized by conscious thinking is good!
So in the same man you can find good and bad!
Bad cannot be rational, it is an impossibility that a rational act can be bad.
A rational/Objectivistic man hence can never be bad.
The freedom of individual in society is rational, the autonomy is required, yet it should be reasonable, and to let it be reasonable, democracy is required.
Democracy not to make dogmatism, democracy not to make a static controlling government, but a democracy should be to protect Individual rights (including property rights) of every citizen and safeguarding every individual from any force. The democratic non-static government must apply force ONLY to stop any breach or Infringement of an Individual’s freedom and his reasonable rights in the society. The democratic non-static government must not and cannot instigate force.
The Individual domain and the market must be completely free of any political force or static despotic rule.
Related Posts
12 viewsWP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck requires Flash Player 9 or better.
13 Responses to “SatyarthPrakash—The Light Of Truth”
Leave a Reply
Amit Vibhuti Says:
January 13th, 2008 at 8:05 amGood one. Keep up..
suren Says:
January 13th, 2008 at 2:28 pmagreed !
is it something like
“what is ideal is real and that is real is rational”? which can be achieved by a rational mind alone !
for argument sake what would be your take on -
a mind can be shaped in a particular manner based on what it sees ! isn’t there a chance for one to see chaos all around and assume chaos as the rational one ? to him can’t it appear to be rational too ?
Me Says:
January 13th, 2008 at 3:15 pm@suren
What is rational is real and it is ideal.
1>Reality exists as an objective absolute—facts are facts, independent of man’s feelings, wishes, hopes or fears.
So, if one is a dettached a dispassionate impartial unbiased person, one can observe the objectivity of facts better. His biasedness may illude him though, drift him from the reality away from the realms of objectivity to the realms of subjectivity.
(Where he may meet Kant)
2>Reason (the faculty which identifies and integrates the material provided by man’s senses) is man’s only means of perceiving reality, his only source of knowledge, his only guide to action, and his basic means of survival.
Reasons are not dependent on Man, they are the authority the faculty of Man, which helps the Man to percieve reality.
Perceptions are subjective. Reasons are objective. Knowledge is always in degree.
3>Man, every man,is an end in himself, not the means to the ends of others. He must exist for his own sake, neither sacrificing himself to others nor sacrificing others to himself. The pursuit of his own rational self-interest and of his own happiness is the highest moral purpose of his life
Virtue of selfishness.
One(I) must not sacrifice others for myself(my pleasure) nor i must sacrifice myself for others pleasure/help etc.
If I am an objectivist(I do not care if I am not) Than I cannot waste myself in criticising and abusing others, pointing out at their weaknesses or strongholds. I would not try to help those who do not deserve, I would not try to avoid helping them who do deserves it.
Why?
Because it will provide me happiness.
suren Says:
January 13th, 2008 at 5:01 pmrational is real ?
was it rationality which evolved first or reality.
Jshree Says:
January 13th, 2008 at 5:09 pmU have gr8 standards of writing.. Keep going
Me Says:
January 13th, 2008 at 5:55 pm@suren
why didn’t you read the whole comment?
What is reason/rational? it is opposite of chaos.
it is (the faculty which identifies and integrates the material provided by man’s senses)it is the cognitive ability, the conscious, the ability to think clearly and coherently, it is the ability to think logically regarded as a basis for knowledge, as distinct from experience or emotions. It is the motive or cause for acting or thinking in a particular way. Chaos itself is unrealistic as its unjustifiable. Reason is man’s only means of perceiving reality, his only source of knowledge, his only guide to action, and his basic means of survival.
Now if some one is stressing more on his biased emotions and perceptions and tending to take chaos as reality and following it too, then it is his irrational behavior. He has to face it… but he cannot be allowed to disrupt and disturb the integrity and life of other individuals, like that Virginia Killer did. It must be avoided. That is for what Individual rights are made of, and the non-static democracy is to provide protection of Individual rights.
Adijo Says:
January 13th, 2008 at 8:10 pmveryy true
u can check out http://www.phi1618.com
good write-up!!!
Adijo
sourav Says:
January 14th, 2008 at 8:09 pmwell it is hard to understand post like this……..but i must say yr standard of writing is very high
keep it up:)
Me Says:
January 14th, 2008 at 11:54 pm@saurabh
It is not very difficult.
As Thomas reid accounted on perception,
Colors, sounds, tastes and smells are powers to produce certain characteristic sensations in us in normal conditions; to ascribe such a quality to an object is not to perceive any intrinsic qualities of the object, but is, rather, to perceive that the object bears a certain relation to something else: namely, ourselves. So, for instance, say that the skin of the apple in front of me has a certain molecular structure that results in its reflecting light at a certain wavelength which in turn causes in me a certain characteristic visual sensation of red. If I am speaking correctly when I say, “That apple is red”, I am reporting the fact that I conceive of the apple as possessing a particular relational property: I am aware that the apple has the property of being-such-as-to-cause-in-me-sensations-of-red-in-normal-conditions.
Actually, it is very simple reality, it is concept of Objectivity
Objectivity is both a metaphysical and an epistemological concept. It pertains to the relationship of consciousness to existence. Metaphysically, it is the recognition of the fact that reality exists independent of any perceiver’s consciousness. Epistemologically, it is the recognition of the fact that a perceiver’s (man’s) consciousness must acquire knowledge of reality by certain means (reason) in accordance with certain rules (logic).
The right perception of reason in accordance with certain natural rules(logic) provides the exact picture of reality.
The dwelling in wrong perception although will cause chaos.
suren Says:
January 14th, 2008 at 11:58 pmGuilherme Says:
January 15th, 2008 at 12:51 amyour blog are so beautiful!
sucess!
see you!
CresceNet Says:
January 15th, 2008 at 6:12 amHello. This post is likeable, and your blog is very interesting, congratulations :-). I will add in my blogroll =). If possible gives a last there on my site, it is about the CresceNet, I hope you enjoy. The address is http://www.provedorcrescenet.com . A hug.
Karthik Murali Says:
January 15th, 2008 at 10:27 amhey..nice blog