Why is it that one cannot clearly decide pros and cons of a resolution? What is it that stops a man (particluary me!) from thinking clearly about which is the better alternative for him?

I guess it is carelessness, lack of self respect and lack of slefishness. You need to be self-centered and well-aware of your profit and loss.

but to say and tell others that they are wrong or right according to my rational thinking is my responsibility as well as my right……

Let me clarify certain things, It is not your responsibility, if you think it is your responsibility, than you are IRRATIONAL. It is not your responsibility.
If you say something about anything here, it is your right, your freedom of speech/expression.

Second thing is, you are no authority to sermon others about what is rational or not. You are surely free to decide your own rational ethics. And once you decide your rational ethics, you are all free to act according to them, and than the your acts and validity of your sense of rationality will be checked on natural laws premises and obviously you will get the results as per the natural laws. Enjoy your life and be the end in your self and let others have their own end in themselves.

If 1 is giving 100% to his consciousness and always strive towards reason,It is rational

Apart from that, if you try to define rationalism for others, than it is irrational. As a matter of fact, you are acting irrational here. Rational is the freedom of a person to decide whether it is more reasonable for him to enjoy the late hours sleep, or to get early and start for office. His freedom is certainly rational. If by all your irrationality you want to force any decision on him, it would be foolishly irrational. So let him decide. Now he has all his freedom and mind to decide what his actions should be, so he need to be properly able to understand what is more profitable for him. And once he understand that, he would obviously achieve his pursuit of happiness.

Now try to get a little rational!

Anyways, now it is over, I won’t be answering any further for your comments. You can choose to keep stressing over your point of view which was never discussed in the original article.

Asit Everything dont depends on hedonism,,everthing depends on Rational point of view dear.

I never said tht anything depends on hedonism, nor I said that hedonism is irrational. Hedonism is rational.
What I said is, everybody is free to take his rational stand. Yet, when one doesn’t look for the various aspects of a determination before commiting to it, he faces more chanes of getting away from that determination and hence breaking the resolution. Hence, it would be proper if a person thinking of making a resolution, makes a proper “reasonable” study of all inclusive aspects of the execution of that resolution before commiting to it, and than positively decide whether he want to commit to that resolution or not. By doing so, he will almost nullify the chances of breaking a resolution to zero.

I will again suggest you to re-read the article and try to understand it properly on rational basis, although I can understand that it is very hard for you to understand what is rational and what is not.

You mean to say that the goal makers are all those people who started their goal to break them

Nah, I never meant to say anything like that.
Rather I was talking of those people who actually take a decision to improve or better themselves but fails to fulfill their promises to their own self. Since they fails to execute their resolutions, they break their resolution and that causes further depression in them resulting in lack of self-confidence.

The economical point is, your every action need to be justified according to your personal sense of profit and loss.

Now you must understand that Profit and/or loss is not always calculated on the basis of money. For a person, enjoying the late hour sleep may seem to be much more profitable than getting up early and starting for the office unhurriedly. So, if he knows that his late hours sleep is more profitable for him than the resolution to get up at 7O’clock in the morning, he will surely decide to sleep until 7:30 a.m and than only start to get ready for office with a little more hurry, because for him, late hours sleep is more profitable, more pleasurable. Similarly, a drunkard may decide to NOT to drink anymore than a peg or two at evening. But if someone of his friends offers him another drink, he has to think whether it is profitable for him to say “No Thanks” for that free drink offered to him, and remain stern on his resolution to not to drink any more, or it is profitable for him to enjoy the free drink offered to him.
If he thinks that the free drink offered to him is more profitable, he will surely break his own resolution to not to drink anymore than two pegs an evening.
I think you need to re-read the article.

There hardly is any difference between faith and trust.

There is a difference between faith and trust, faith surpasses your judgment but trust does not.If you have faith in something, you simply stop judging it, you consider it true by all means.

2. For the most part, one’s ability to exactly evaluate the pros and cons of the execution of a resolution is always outshined by his ability to handle the temptation that is accompanied with breaking that resolution, as one with a functional brain (say you!) always chooses a resolution with minimum or zero cons of execution.