<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Population, Poverty and Production</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reasonforliberty.com/objectivism/population-poverty-and-production.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/economy/population-poverty-and-production.html</link>
	<description>Because everything has a reason!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:55:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mixed Economy or Interventionism &#124; Reason for Liberty</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/economy/population-poverty-and-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-2776</link>
		<dc:creator>Mixed Economy or Interventionism &#124; Reason for Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=1710#comment-2776</guid>
		<description>[...] and free&#160;market. Footnotes:Burden of debt and loss, Reason for Liberty [&#8617;] [&#8617;]Population, Poverty and production, Reason for Liberty [&#8617;]Such Interventions creates Forced Economic Inequalities, Economic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #fdedd1; margin-left: -2em; padding: 1em 1em 1em 2em; ">
<p>[&#8230;] and free&nbsp;market. Footnotes:Burden of debt and loss, Reason for Liberty [&#8617;] [&#8617;]Population, Poverty and production, Reason for Liberty [&#8617;]Such Interventions creates Forced Economic Inequalities, Economic&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Self-Defense, Right of Living, and&#160;Handguns &#124; Reason for Liberty</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/economy/population-poverty-and-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-1725</link>
		<dc:creator>Self-Defense, Right of Living, and&#160;Handguns &#124; Reason for Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 06:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=1710#comment-1725</guid>
		<description>[...] population was 6.8 per cent in 1991 and it will be over 8.9 per cent in 2016. Delhi alone has a population of five million ‘financially secure’ senior citizens. Over 170,000 are old couples living [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #fdedd1; margin-left: -2em; padding: 1em 1em 1em 2em; ">
<p>[&#8230;] population was 6.8 per cent in 1991 and it will be over 8.9 per cent in 2016. Delhi alone has a population of five million ‘financially secure’ senior citizens. Over 170,000 are old couples living&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emigioutt</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/economy/population-poverty-and-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-1724</link>
		<dc:creator>emigioutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=1710#comment-1724</guid>
		<description>I am unable to understand this post. But well some points are useful for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am unable to understand this post. But well some points are useful for&nbsp;me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Middle&#160;Vice! &#124; Reason for Liberty</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/economy/population-poverty-and-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-1723</link>
		<dc:creator>The Middle&#160;Vice! &#124; Reason for Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=1710#comment-1723</guid>
		<description>[...] now and it will not be good. They agrees socialism is bad, they claim capitalism may be bad; hence they suggest the Mixed Economy, as the middle path. Nicomachean Ethics suggests, &#8220;Virtue must have the quality of aiming at the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #fdedd1; margin-left: -2em; padding: 1em 1em 1em 2em; ">
<p>[&#8230;] now and it will not be good. They agrees socialism is bad, they claim capitalism may be bad; hence they suggest the Mixed Economy, as the middle path. Nicomachean Ethics suggests, &#8220;Virtue must have the quality of aiming at the&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GP</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/economy/population-poverty-and-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-1720</link>
		<dc:creator>GP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=1710#comment-1720</guid>
		<description>Good One!!. Especially The definition of poverty and what can be done to reduce the poverty i.e. Increasing productivity of each individual.
I also agree with your idea about cancelling welfare programs by Govt.(but I think exceptions shud be made to genuince cases of physically handicapped individuals who cannot work)
But I think Indian govt. shud also keep a check on sensus by ensuring 2 child policy gets implemented in all section of society..It seems difficult though considering the democratic system in India
and mass illiteracy and lack of awareness among few communities but I think we will get there sooner or later.
I think India have to adopt regulated capitalism instead of free Market capitalism and of course we shud need strong foundation of primary and higher education to make sure we get highly qualified and trained manpower</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good One!!. Especially The definition of poverty and what can be done to reduce the poverty i.e. Increasing productivity of each individual.<br />
I also agree with your idea about cancelling welfare programs by Govt.(but I think exceptions shud be made to genuince cases of physically handicapped individuals who cannot work)<br />
But I think Indian govt. shud also keep a check on sensus by ensuring 2 child policy gets implemented in all section of society..It seems difficult though considering the democratic system in India<br />
and mass illiteracy and lack of awareness among few communities but I think we will get there sooner or later.<br />
I think India have to adopt regulated capitalism instead of free Market capitalism and of course we shud need strong foundation of primary and higher education to make sure we get highly qualified and trained&nbsp;manpower</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpretentious Diva</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/economy/population-poverty-and-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-1719</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpretentious Diva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=1710#comment-1719</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;i disagree with the notion that ‘population’ is a problem in any form at all.
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
So it is the answer for the question &quot;Is population explosion a drastic problem with catastrophic consequences?&quot;
&lt;span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
Yet, the answer itself is in sense of collectivism. it is for the Individual person or a couple to decide if they should go for family planning or not.
Population may not be a problem on collective progress of a nation or earth, but for a family, the family makers will have to decide how much they wanna expand and why. There neither comes the question of capitalism or socialism or even religion. it is individual&#039;s choice or the choice of a couple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>i disagree with the notion that ‘population’ is a problem in any form at all.<br />
</em><br />
<span></span><br />
So it is the answer for the question &#8220;Is population explosion a drastic problem with catastrophic consequences?&#8221;<br />
<span></span><br />
Yet, the answer itself is in sense of collectivism. it is for the Individual person or a couple to decide if they should go for family planning or not.<br />
Population may not be a problem on collective progress of a nation or earth, but for a family, the family makers will have to decide how much they wanna expand and why. There neither comes the question of capitalism or socialism or even religion. it is individual&#8217;s choice or the choice of a&nbsp;couple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: renegade_division</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/economy/population-poverty-and-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-1722</link>
		<dc:creator>renegade_division</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=1710#comment-1722</guid>
		<description>@Dsylexic
Don&#039;t forget that socialist Govts also benefit from population control programs, it benefits them because now they will have to plan for less number of people. Population control programs only exist in Socialist centrally planned countries.

In a free market society more poor people means more cheap labor, that means more profitable businesses. But for a socialist society, more people means more people to provide welfare to. Also since more welfare is being provided, market is unable to affect the poor people in making their decisions about their kids. If Market does not need more poor people then it will disincentivize them and they will stop procreating.

For example if right now if Free Market was the only &quot;welfare&quot; to the people, the population growth rate will fall significantly, for next 10-20 years, after which the market will have fully absorbed these people and will need more of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dsylexic<br />
Don&#8217;t forget that socialist Govts also benefit from population control programs, it benefits them because now they will have to plan for less number of people. Population control programs only exist in Socialist centrally planned&nbsp;countries.</p>
<p>In a free market society more poor people means more cheap labor, that means more profitable businesses. But for a socialist society, more people means more people to provide welfare to. Also since more welfare is being provided, market is unable to affect the poor people in making their decisions about their kids. If Market does not need more poor people then it will disincentivize them and they will stop&nbsp;procreating.</p>
<p>For example if right now if Free Market was the only &#8220;welfare&#8221; to the people, the population growth rate will fall significantly, for next 10-20 years, after which the market will have fully absorbed these people and will need more of&nbsp;them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dsylexic</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/economy/population-poverty-and-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-1721</link>
		<dc:creator>Dsylexic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=1710#comment-1721</guid>
		<description>i disagree with the notion that &#039;population&#039; is a problem in any form at all. such old malthusian ideas have been trashed long back. people are the the engines of economic growth -how can you ever call them as a problem. the problem might be the restrictions that the state puts them under.the lack of law enforcement including those of property titles is not because of population growth at all. it indicates a failure of collectivist statist behaviour.

we in india have to be extremely wary of the so called noble hearted whites trying to &#039;control&#039; population growth in india/asia -especially amongst the poor. Paul Elrich was one of those who predicted vast number of human beings dying because of population growth -now he sits on the board of many climate control committees of govt. he is essentially a control freak,a freedom hater. people like him provide false intellectual cover to &#039;control&#039; and command activities of the state.

the systematic attempt to reduce the population of the poor in asia is a dastardly attempt at eugenics and should be recogzined for what it is .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i disagree with the notion that &#8216;population&#8217; is a problem in any form at all. such old malthusian ideas have been trashed long back. people are the the engines of economic growth -how can you ever call them as a problem. the problem might be the restrictions that the state puts them under.the lack of law enforcement including those of property titles is not because of population growth at all. it indicates a failure of collectivist statist&nbsp;behaviour.</p>
<p>we in india have to be extremely wary of the so called noble hearted whites trying to &#8216;control&#8217; population growth in india/asia -especially amongst the poor. Paul Elrich was one of those who predicted vast number of human beings dying because of population growth -now he sits on the board of many climate control committees of govt. he is essentially a control freak,a freedom hater. people like him provide false intellectual cover to &#8216;control&#8217; and command activities of the&nbsp;state.</p>
<p>the systematic attempt to reduce the population of the poor in asia is a dastardly attempt at eugenics and should be recogzined for what it is&nbsp;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpretentious Diva</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/economy/population-poverty-and-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-1718</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpretentious Diva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=1710#comment-1718</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Your concept seems to be workable but not in India.
 Do you think that you can take muslims too into confidence and help them aware about problems of growing population in a place like India. I am myself a muslim and I don’t feel the religon would  succumb to other pressures..&lt;/blockquote&gt;

umm...what pressure you are talking about?

See, your progress is not dependent on your religion. How does it matters if you are muslim or hindu or sikh?
Irrespective of your religion, you need to work for a living, and you need to provide good healthy life to your children your family members too. Religion won&#039;t be helping you, you will have to help yourself. You will have to work for your own progress.
There is no need for you to think for all muslims collectively, or all indians. Just work for your own progress and productivity. You cannot take decisions for all muslims of India, nor any muslim religious leader can force you accept his decisions. You have freedom to use your own mind for your own progress, and freedom to renounce any sort of indoctrinations, and try to save your friends, kids and colleagues too from indoctrinations. That will be enough from your side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Your concept seems to be workable but not in India.<br />
 Do you think that you can take muslims too into confidence and help them aware about problems of growing population in a place like India. I am myself a muslim and I don’t feel the religon would  succumb to&nbsp;other pressures..</p></blockquote>
<p>umm&#8230;what pressure you are talking&nbsp;about?</p>
<p>See, your progress is not dependent on your religion. How does it matters if you are muslim or hindu or sikh?<br />
Irrespective of your religion, you need to work for a living, and you need to provide good healthy life to your children your family members too. Religion won&#8217;t be helping you, you will have to help yourself. You will have to work for your own progress.<br />
There is no need for you to think for all muslims collectively, or all indians. Just work for your own progress and productivity. You cannot take decisions for all muslims of India, nor any muslim religious leader can force you accept his decisions. You have freedom to use your own mind for your own progress, and freedom to renounce any sort of indoctrinations, and try to save your friends, kids and colleagues too from indoctrinations. That will be enough from your&nbsp;side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: umarblogs</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/economy/population-poverty-and-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-1717</link>
		<dc:creator>umarblogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=1710#comment-1717</guid>
		<description>Your concept seems to be workable but not in India.
Do you think that you can take muslims too into confidence and help them aware about problems of growing population in a place like India. I am myself a muslim and I don&#039;t feel the religon would  succumb to other pressures..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your concept seems to be workable but not in India.<br />
Do you think that you can take muslims too into confidence and help them aware about problems of growing population in a place like India. I am myself a muslim and I don&#8217;t feel the religon would  succumb to other&nbsp;pressures..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HOBO(nickname)</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/economy/population-poverty-and-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-1716</link>
		<dc:creator>HOBO(nickname)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=1710#comment-1716</guid>
		<description>awareness is awakening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awareness is&nbsp;awakening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Population, Poverty and Production</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/economy/population-poverty-and-production.html/comment-page-1#comment-1715</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Population, Poverty and Production</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=1710#comment-1715</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest here:  Population, Poverty and Production [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #fdedd1; margin-left: -2em; padding: 1em 1em 1em 2em; ">
<p>[&#8230;] Read the rest here:  Population, Poverty and Production&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
