Comments on: Animal Rights Activists-the Terrorists http://www.reasonforliberty.com/objectivism/animal-rights-activists-the-terrorists.html Because everything has a reason! Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:52:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Chandria http://www.reasonforliberty.com/objectivism/animal-rights-activists-the-terrorists.html#comment-1206 Chandria Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:40:23 +0000 http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=575#comment-1206 Animal rights. This is normally a subject that stirs up quite a debate. For me i feel testing on animals so i can colour my hair or change how i look is wrong. If we hate our appearance so much then we can hide this quickly and cheaply. Buy a paper bag cut a few hole and stick it over our heads. Problem solved. Then we move on to testing new drugs, making sure things like what side affects their could be, but how can they truly say that drugs that worked on animals are safe for us. Their is a piece in this blog written about this :- <a href="http://www.reasonforliberty.com/humanism/bioethics-medical-experiments-and-the-case-of-tgn1412.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/humanism/bioethics-medical-experiments-and-the-case-of-tgn1412.html</a>  It is about a experiment that went very wrong here in the UK. I know some blame was laid at the feet of the people it affected, but i suppose they believed that the drug was safe. After all you can't just go out and find people to test potions on. I can't go out and mix together a load of herbs and say can i test it on some people, it may kill them but, it would not be allowed, but i wonder has this ever happened before. Here it made the papers for weeks, but say this happened in a poorer country. A big company offering money to maybe a poor farmer who can't feed his family. You could even give him test reports on the drug, but if they can't read then. It maybe seen as a way to get money quick, and if it goes wrong, it probably wouldn't take much to keep the family quiet, and if it got out it probably in many countries be unimportant. But what possibilities. If they die you can find out why. Their will be a time when the only way to test is by using humans. We are changing and evolving, and the animals we test on are changing too, they may even one day build their own immunity to these diseases, but i suppose while these debates go on and maybe even the companies encourage these debates, that these company's maybe using human Guinea pigs, and the experiment that went wrong here maybe a lot more common then we think. Money has a loud voice to people who have none Animal rights. This is normally a subject that stirs up quite a debate. For me i feel testing on animals so i can colour my hair or change how i look is wrong. If we hate our appearance so much then we can hide this quickly and cheaply. Buy a paper bag cut a few hole and stick it over our heads. Problem solved. Then we move on to testing new drugs, making sure things like what side affects their could be, but how can they truly say that drugs that worked on animals are safe for us. Their is a piece in this blog written about this :- http://www.reasonforliberty.com/humanism/bioethics-medical-experiments-and-the-case-of-tgn1412.html  It is about a experiment that went very wrong here in the UK. I know some blame was laid at the feet of the people it affected, but i suppose they believed that the drug was safe. After all you can’t just go out and find people to test potions on. I can’t go out and mix together a load of herbs and say can i test it on some people, it may kill them but, it would not be allowed, but i wonder has this ever happened before. Here it made the papers for weeks, but say this happened in a poorer country. A big company offering money to maybe a poor farmer who can’t feed his family. You could even give him test reports on the drug, but if they can’t read then. It maybe seen as a way to get money quick, and if it goes wrong, it probably wouldn’t take much to keep the family quiet, and if it got out it probably in many countries be unimportant. But what possibilities. If they die you can find out why. Their will be a time when the only way to test is by using humans. We are changing and evolving, and the animals we test on are changing too, they may even one day build their own immunity to these diseases, but i suppose while these debates go on and maybe even the companies encourage these debates, that these company’s maybe using human Guinea pigs, and the experiment that went wrong here maybe a lot more common then we think. Money has a loud voice to people who have none

]]> By: renegade_division http://www.reasonforliberty.com/objectivism/animal-rights-activists-the-terrorists.html#comment-1204 renegade_division Tue, 19 Aug 2008 04:44:05 +0000 http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=575#comment-1204 @Tracy <a href=”http://www.kcbs.com/Animal-Rights-Group-Admits-to-Santa-Cruz-Firebombi/2721426″ rel="nofollow">Animal Rights Group Admits to Santa Cruz Firebombings</a><br/> <br/> I hardly think those two UC SC biologists were firebombed by their girlfriends, angry husbands whose wives they are sleeping with, Al Queda terrorists who believe UCSC biologists are insulting Allah. @Tracy
Animal Rights Group Admits to Santa Cruz Firebombings

I hardly think those two UC SC biologists were firebombed by their girlfriends, angry husbands whose wives they are sleeping with, Al Queda terrorists who believe UCSC biologists are insulting Allah.

]]> By: Tracy http://www.reasonforliberty.com/objectivism/animal-rights-activists-the-terrorists.html#comment-1205 Tracy Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:58:09 +0000 http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=575#comment-1205 "the animal rights activists bombed two UC Santa Cruz biologists" Really? So they've arrested them, tried them and convicted them? No. No arrests have been made. What you're reporting is mere speculation and does a disservice to your readers and to truth, in general. “the animal rights activists bombed two UC Santa Cruz biologists”

Really? So they’ve arrested them, tried them and convicted them? No. No arrests have been made. What you’re reporting is mere speculation and does a disservice to your readers and to truth, in general.

]]>