May
28
Valmiki Ramayana ended with the return of Ram-Sita to Ajodhya, Valmiki presented characters of Ram-Sita as simple human beings with uncompromising reasonable morals and there was no FIRE-TEST for Sita in Valmiki Ramayana!
Many people say that Ramayana is a story of compassion and selflessness, but a stern look will remove these misconceptions. Ramayana was strictly an objectivistic tale based on reasons and uncompromising morals like a democratic society, capitalistic free-trade civilization and virtue of selfishness.
King Dashrath and Kaikeyye were ruling the democratic state of Aryavrata when a dictatorial unprincipled attacker Ravana crossed the borders and forced the civilians of Aryavrata to succumb against his force and violence. Aryavrata was a land of voluntary army and taxation. Therefore, the army of Ajodhya under the command of Dashrath and Kaikeyye tried to safeguard the civilians and researchers of Aryavrata by following the Objectivistic ethics of government to provide security for the individuals of the society against any physical force. However, Ravana defeated the army of Dashrath and forced a system tax against Aryavrata to avoid further violence.
Then Dashrath had four sons whom Kaikeyye nurtured freely and took care of them perfectly while her Objectivistic aim to provide security to the public of her nation and create a free society again was always in her mind.
She never instigated violence in any of her son, yet she understood it right from the childhood that Ram the eldest was most efficient and able person amongst the four.
After their formal education under Rishi Vashishtha, when the four son of Dashrath returned to Ajodhya, Kaikeyye herself took proper examination of her four sons along with other students of Rishi Vashishtha. She found Ram the best amongst all, and she realized that Ram deserves to be the ruler.
With the help of Rishi Durvasa, Kaikeyye promoted Ram for further studies and learning skills as a good ruler by sending him to safeguard the researchers and scientists in a region where the terror of Ravana was influential. Ram completed his task devotedly and Rishi Durvasa provided him further skills and abilities under his guidance, also Ram met Sita who had properly chosen a ability to test for her would be husband where Ram won her heart and hence her love too. It was a perfect love-story.
When Ram came back from his winning expedition, Kaikeyye was convinced that Ram deserves to be the ruler of Aryavrata.
One must not forget that in a democratic free civilization, the proper work of the government is to safeguard the citizen from the violent people who initiates the use of physical force, from criminals’ robbers, thief’s gangsters, and corrupt traders. Force can only be applied as retaliation only against those who instigates the force in a free society where liberty is precious for every individual. A democratic impartial government, whose principle and only task must be, the protection of citizens as the police officer, can achieve this.
When Dashrath proposed Ram as the new ruler, whole populace unanimously accepted it that was a democratic choice. However, Dashrath was too emotional, and might have tried to evade the primary objective of a ruler, which Ram must fulfill. In order to make Ram realize that he has a major task to get rid of the terror of Ravana to provide a free system for the citizens of Aryavrata, Kaikeyye dramatically demanded fourteen years of exile for Ram as she knew that any of Dashrath other 3 son may fulfill the duty of Ram as representative.
Ram understood the prerogative of her mother Kaikeyye and willfully accepted the exile to complete his objectivistic task being the ruler.
Sita, being an objectivistic wife of Ram, preferred to be with ram instead of waiting for him at Ajodhya.
In the period of exile, Ram always followed his Objectivistic duties being a ruler completely and most selfishly.
In case of Bali, he knew that Bali was a terrorist terrorizing the people and it was impossible to defeat Bali face to face or arrest him.
Although mercy and forgiveness are good qualities, yet if they be prompted by unreasoning prejudice, mercy becomes equivalent to cruelty and forgiveness becomes as bad as revenge. What we mean to say is that it is not possible to enforce the principle of not causing pain to any living creature on all occasions. Punishing the wicked is, in fact, an act of mercy. If a wicked person be exempted from punishment, thousands will suffer at his hands.
This act of (misplaced) mercy will be as much fruitful of mischief as cruelty, and this act of forgiveness will prove as bad as revenge. It is quite true that mercy consists in endeavoring to promote the happiness of all sentient beings and to wean them from sorrow.
Ram finished Bali and his illegal authority on one part of his governed state and hence completed his task being a ruler.
Ravana was defeated in war and was killed as a war hero after which Ram-Sita returned to Ajodhya and liver happily ever after.
Ram followed his objectivistic duty with most earnest selfish behavior, always tending to follow his self-chosen dharma irrespective of any fear or whimsical unreasonable desires and achieved the status of unanimously chosen best democratic leader/ruler of his times.
On the other hand, Sita was the most objectivistic woman reflecting ram’s moral principles within her own life with utmost sincerity and perfection by virtue of her own objectivistic selfish duty towards her own inherited pleasure. To chose to be with Ram during exile period was her objectivistic right, and to demand the Golden-dear at Kishkindha jungle was her prerogative desire. To protect and safeguard herself against the oppressive Ravana and believing Ram will come to rescue her shows her excellent trust in rationales of life and moral principles, while her gracious return to Ajodhya and attaining the prestige of being the queen of Ajodhya was her attained capable right.
Lakshman Himself was an objectivistic morally principled soldier who willfully chose to serve the moral principles of being a perfect protector of civilians against the oppressive gangster Ravana.
On the other hand, Bharat and Shatrughna trusted their self-worth and self-esteem in following their Dharma of providing a well-established democratic Government where Bharat very optimistically and devotedly fulfilled his role as the representative administrator of Ram.
Together the four were excellent system of a democratic system,
The case of Shabri and Kevat shows how free and well rehearsed the society was without any prejudice and illusive status class system where every individual got his correct worth full grace and price based on his own individualistic self-chosen work depending on his abilities and sense of applicability.
I see no wrong in Valmiki’s Ramayana. However, later versions of Ramayana changed it to some socialistic selfless entailing story that is nothing but a fraud. The addition of Uttarakhand in RamCharitManas by Tulsidas is biggest bigotry based action of plagiarize one can expect.
King Dashrath and Kaikeyye were ruling the democratic state of Aryavrata when a dictatorial unprincipled attacker Ravana crossed the borders and forced the civilians of Aryavrata to succumb against his force and violence. Aryavrata was a land of voluntary army and taxation. Therefore, the army of Ajodhya under the command of Dashrath and Kaikeyye tried to safeguard the civilians and researchers of Aryavrata by following the Objectivistic ethics of government to provide security for the individuals of the society against any physical force. However, Ravana defeated the army of Dashrath and forced a system tax against Aryavrata to avoid further violence.
Then Dashrath had four sons whom Kaikeyye nurtured freely and took care of them perfectly while her Objectivistic aim to provide security to the public of her nation and create a free society again was always in her mind.
She never instigated violence in any of her son, yet she understood it right from the childhood that Ram the eldest was most efficient and able person amongst the four.
After their formal education under Rishi Vashishtha, when the four son of Dashrath returned to Ajodhya, Kaikeyye herself took proper examination of her four sons along with other students of Rishi Vashishtha. She found Ram the best amongst all, and she realized that Ram deserves to be the ruler.
With the help of Rishi Durvasa, Kaikeyye promoted Ram for further studies and learning skills as a good ruler by sending him to safeguard the researchers and scientists in a region where the terror of Ravana was influential. Ram completed his task devotedly and Rishi Durvasa provided him further skills and abilities under his guidance, also Ram met Sita who had properly chosen a ability to test for her would be husband where Ram won her heart and hence her love too. It was a perfect love-story.
When Ram came back from his winning expedition, Kaikeyye was convinced that Ram deserves to be the ruler of Aryavrata.
One must not forget that in a democratic free civilization, the proper work of the government is to safeguard the citizen from the violent people who initiates the use of physical force, from criminals’ robbers, thief’s gangsters, and corrupt traders. Force can only be applied as retaliation only against those who instigates the force in a free society where liberty is precious for every individual. A democratic impartial government, whose principle and only task must be, the protection of citizens as the police officer, can achieve this.
When Dashrath proposed Ram as the new ruler, whole populace unanimously accepted it that was a democratic choice. However, Dashrath was too emotional, and might have tried to evade the primary objective of a ruler, which Ram must fulfill. In order to make Ram realize that he has a major task to get rid of the terror of Ravana to provide a free system for the citizens of Aryavrata, Kaikeyye dramatically demanded fourteen years of exile for Ram as she knew that any of Dashrath other 3 son may fulfill the duty of Ram as representative.
Ram understood the prerogative of her mother Kaikeyye and willfully accepted the exile to complete his objectivistic task being the ruler.
Sita, being an objectivistic wife of Ram, preferred to be with ram instead of waiting for him at Ajodhya.
In the period of exile, Ram always followed his Objectivistic duties being a ruler completely and most selfishly.
In case of Bali, he knew that Bali was a terrorist terrorizing the people and it was impossible to defeat Bali face to face or arrest him.
Although mercy and forgiveness are good qualities, yet if they be prompted by unreasoning prejudice, mercy becomes equivalent to cruelty and forgiveness becomes as bad as revenge. What we mean to say is that it is not possible to enforce the principle of not causing pain to any living creature on all occasions. Punishing the wicked is, in fact, an act of mercy. If a wicked person be exempted from punishment, thousands will suffer at his hands.
This act of (misplaced) mercy will be as much fruitful of mischief as cruelty, and this act of forgiveness will prove as bad as revenge. It is quite true that mercy consists in endeavoring to promote the happiness of all sentient beings and to wean them from sorrow.
Ram finished Bali and his illegal authority on one part of his governed state and hence completed his task being a ruler.
Ravana was defeated in war and was killed as a war hero after which Ram-Sita returned to Ajodhya and liver happily ever after.
Ram followed his objectivistic duty with most earnest selfish behavior, always tending to follow his self-chosen dharma irrespective of any fear or whimsical unreasonable desires and achieved the status of unanimously chosen best democratic leader/ruler of his times.
On the other hand, Sita was the most objectivistic woman reflecting ram’s moral principles within her own life with utmost sincerity and perfection by virtue of her own objectivistic selfish duty towards her own inherited pleasure. To chose to be with Ram during exile period was her objectivistic right, and to demand the Golden-dear at Kishkindha jungle was her prerogative desire. To protect and safeguard herself against the oppressive Ravana and believing Ram will come to rescue her shows her excellent trust in rationales of life and moral principles, while her gracious return to Ajodhya and attaining the prestige of being the queen of Ajodhya was her attained capable right.
Lakshman Himself was an objectivistic morally principled soldier who willfully chose to serve the moral principles of being a perfect protector of civilians against the oppressive gangster Ravana.
On the other hand, Bharat and Shatrughna trusted their self-worth and self-esteem in following their Dharma of providing a well-established democratic Government where Bharat very optimistically and devotedly fulfilled his role as the representative administrator of Ram.
Together the four were excellent system of a democratic system,
The case of Shabri and Kevat shows how free and well rehearsed the society was without any prejudice and illusive status class system where every individual got his correct worth full grace and price based on his own individualistic self-chosen work depending on his abilities and sense of applicability.
I see no wrong in Valmiki’s Ramayana. However, later versions of Ramayana changed it to some socialistic selfless entailing story that is nothing but a fraud. The addition of Uttarakhand in RamCharitManas by Tulsidas is biggest bigotry based action of plagiarize one can expect.
I consider the love of Ram-Sita as the best love-story amongst all.
Related Posts
28 viewsWP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck requires Flash Player 9 or better.
5 Responses to “The Objectivistic Aryavrata”
Leave a Reply
walker walkin alone Says:
December 22nd, 2007 at 10:40 pmI shall write on it.
I do agree on some parts, but I do have differences too
b!ack-dranz3r Says:
December 23rd, 2007 at 3:08 amnot much interested in these stories of Ram-Sita nd stuff……but wht u wrote made me read more…..couldnt stop…nicely written…
b!ack-dranz3r Says:
December 23rd, 2007 at 3:11 amnot much into these stories of Ram-Sita……tho how u wrote wht u wrote made me read more and more….couldnt stop…..nice way of writin…….altho i dun agree on ne of those things……..
Sam Says:
December 23rd, 2007 at 3:50 amwell written!!!
Sam Says:
December 23rd, 2007 at 5:51 amhey thnx for the visit!! :)