Take the “New Democratic Party” here in Canada.  The NDP is Canada’s third party (4th if you count th regional separatist Bloc Quebecois party) and pushes for PR and other changes to the electoral system in Canada.  In provinces where the NDP has held power in the provincial legislatures, not a single NDP government has ever pushed for PR in any of the provinces.  They don’t push for it because they know it would mean and end to their shot at majority governments in the provinces.  If the NDP federally ever gained a position tht would allow them to form government, I’m sure PR would become an issue we hear much less about.

In a system that relies on first past the post, PR does not suit those who are accustomed to governing.

Interesting observation, any voting percentage less than 50 should be actually taken as against democracy itself. Even if 51% people vote, it is still against any particular party because total percentage people against will be still high. This is in fact the third irony of democracy which I missed in my original post, good that you pointed it out.

Well I deliberately left that portion, I had in fact mentioned in the post about how free will gets converted to just few choices…and left it at that as I deemed the topic beyond the scope of the article. I agree these conditioning exists, but as you yourself have put a clause of intellectual conditioning, I need not explain the concept of rationality and logic. Yes Mind needs to be trained/conditioned before it can take some decision. I would quote something from Ayn Rand’s lecture who needs philosophy
” without philosophy, you would not be able to deal with concrete, particular, real-life problems. You would be in a position of a new born infant, to whom every object is a unique, unprecedented phenomenon. the difference between his mental state and yours lies in the number of conceptual integration your mind has performed.

Sorry GP, you are not paying us to entertain you. For you, you love slavery and you have no wish to seek for freedom (Nirvana, Moksha).
Not all are like that.

We all are borne free, with life and age, some of us becomes slaves, some becomes dominant, and some chooses to be the seeker of freedom, promoting the sense and cause of freedom. Now that is Marquis De Sade!

Thats what I was expected as solution
there’s only single solution. Removal of compulsory taxation, economic liberty, No governmental currency.
Government has no right to loot citizens, and if that unwarranted immoral, unethical right from the government is taken away, things will be just fine.

It seldom happens in a democratic set up that a nation goes into war or undertakes military operations without public will in its favor.

Yes, well that is true, and to take public in favour, whole governmental set-up devotes itself to create illusions of varied kinds.
It is noteworthy that German citizenry chose Hitler democratically. Then he created the Aryan superiority clouds, cultural differences and discrimination, nationalistic emotional issues and socialistic dream-world, to fulfil all illusive ideas, he had to take control of every part of German democratic setup. He had to dissolve citizen freedom and had to exhort the citizenry to support the World War2 by either hook or crook. It is noticeable that German citizenry accepted the war because of the nationalistic shame feeling of loss in the previous World War and defeat. Now not all were supporting Hitler, neither war. Those who were against Hitler were butchered and killed brutally.
Same was the case with India during the 1971 war.
India chose Indira Gandhi democratically and whole population was convinced that a war with Pakistan is necessary, India was going through poverty, inflation and crisis, yet to help Bangladesh was necessary. USSR and India knew it is crucial to make a point against growing American influence in Indian Subcontinent through the help of Pakistan, and Indian population was taken in confidence with the help of evidential Pakistan involvement against Indian activities at Kashmir and Punjab.
Yet that war lead Indians towards the first emergency period, Indians saw complete distortion of every limited freedom they had.
Pakistan government also used government setup to create illusionary environment to get support for wars and military activities many a times.
Obviously, war mongers uses democratic set-up to convince the majority, yet it ends in destruction of even the limited freedom citizen get under the government.

The first Irony of the political freedom is the very logic of democracy[1] which just seeks a 50% + 1 as the mandatory majority for any democratic resolution to get through.

Only solution to such irony is voluntary taxation. If government is not allowed to loot the citizen forcibly, things will not remain same. Yet, it is difficult to get 50%+1 votes to ensure voluntary taxation.
Now consider democratic election process in India. Almost 60 % of total Indian population are eligible to vote.
Out of which in a general election, average voters who votes is almost 69%.
Thus out of every 100 Indians, 60 can vote, and out of those 100 who can vote, 69 actually votes.
50% of 69/70 is 35. That is, if one political party gets 35%+1 vote of voters, it can rule whole India. Not only that, with the new trend of mixed party governments, and political agreements amongst the party, even 20% vote of vote eligible population is enough to rule over India.

Your idea Hegelian Dialect confers that to stage the false importance and necessity of government, government may create devils too, to make a situation of Good government Vs devils (Terrorism? Wars? Militants? )http://www.reasonforliberty.com/reason/why-there-are-wars-terrorists-and-militants.html

Consider an election in a system with three viable political parties for instance.  In Canada, majority governing territory is often considered approximately 40% of the popular vote.  This in and of itself means a majority parliament can be formed with a minority of the popular vote because of the system of election we use.  Consider as well that often times, Canada experiences about 60% voter turn out.  This means a majority of government law makers can be elected by about 30% of the eligible electorate.  Thus in theory, democracy is a majority governing body while in practise, it is in fact a minority governing body.

Even if 100% of the voters in the previous election in Canada had voted for one party, that would have been only 60% of the eligible electorate meaning the 40% who didn’t vote find themselves governed by those elected to power by the 60% who voted.

Simply put…democracy is the tyranny of the majority in theory only and the tyranny of the minority in practise.