<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The catastrophe lovers want to return to Dark Ages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html</link>
	<description>Because everything has a reason!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:52:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Going green or Going Nuclear? &#124; Reason for Liberty</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-3797</link>
		<dc:creator>Going green or Going Nuclear? &#124; Reason for Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-3797</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cost of being&#160;Green &#124; Reason for Liberty</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>The Cost of being&#160;Green &#124; Reason for Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-660</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gopi</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>gopi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-659</guid>
		<description>first and foremost : for ur info - neither am i a govt person, nor an environmentalist. i&#039;m just a student trying to understand austrian economics.and &quot;deadmanoncampus&quot; who blogs in dis site can confirm that.so there&#039;s no need to get personal.

second : i&#039;m also oppsed to taxes

third : i&#039;m a non smoker..and i dont stand near ppl who smoke..but i never ask ppl not to smoke (bcoz that wud b an infringement upon thier right).however, i ask them not to smoke in public places coz that hurts other ppl.if i know that de smoke won&#039;t hurt others, i hav no probs wid it.same is de case wid CO2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first and foremost : for ur info &#8211; neither am i a govt person, nor an environmentalist. i&#8217;m just a student trying to understand austrian economics.and &#8220;deadmanoncampus&#8221; who blogs in dis site can confirm that.so there&#8217;s no need to get personal.</p>
<p>second : i&#8217;m also oppsed to taxes</p>
<p>third : i&#8217;m a non smoker..and i dont stand near ppl who smoke..but i never ask ppl not to smoke (bcoz that wud b an infringement upon thier right).however, i ask them not to smoke in public places coz that hurts other ppl.if i know that de smoke won&#8217;t hurt others, i hav no probs wid it.same is de case wid CO2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpretentious Diva</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpretentious Diva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-658</guid>
		<description>As I said earlier, you can believe all your catastrophic and apocalyptic fears and falsehoods.
You cannot and should not force your phobias on others.

it makes no sense that since you fear guns hence you won&#039;t allow anyone to hold gun, or will license it.

Similarly, its make no sense that since you do not like pornography yourself, hence you will ban/restrict others to like pornography or me to take my own nude pictures and moving shots.

Similarly it makes no sense that since you fear CO2, you will restrict people using wood/coke/coal to burn. its all senseless.
Even without any carbon tax, 69% remote villages in India do not have electricity, most of the city suffers power cuts. With carbon taxes, its dark for further more people. And I know how anti-human you environmentalist can get.

Lol you want people to prove that they can live free?

Who the heck are you or your government to enslave people?

The burden of onus to prove is ON YOU. there is no proof that temperature of earth is increasing.

&lt;strong&gt;There are valid proofs that temperature of Earth is Decreasing since last ten years, and now it is same as it was in 1980&#039;s.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said earlier, you can believe all your catastrophic and apocalyptic fears and falsehoods.<br />
You cannot and should not force your phobias on others.</p>
<p>it makes no sense that since you fear guns hence you won&#8217;t allow anyone to hold gun, or will license it.</p>
<p>Similarly, its make no sense that since you do not like pornography yourself, hence you will ban/restrict others to like pornography or me to take my own nude pictures and moving shots.</p>
<p>Similarly it makes no sense that since you fear CO2, you will restrict people using wood/coke/coal to burn. its all senseless.<br />
Even without any carbon tax, 69% remote villages in India do not have electricity, most of the city suffers power cuts. With carbon taxes, its dark for further more people. And I know how anti-human you environmentalist can get.</p>
<p>Lol you want people to prove that they can live free?</p>
<p>Who the heck are you or your government to enslave people?</p>
<p>The burden of onus to prove is ON YOU. there is no proof that temperature of earth is increasing.</p>
<p><strong>There are valid proofs that temperature of Earth is Decreasing since last ten years, and now it is same as it was in 1980&#8242;s.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gopi</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>gopi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-657</guid>
		<description>what u r saying abt de suffering of de classes is abt taxes in general.. and i&#039;m wid u on that account.if u or neone can convince me that &quot;men can never change earth to another venus&quot;,i&#039;d change my stance on carbon tax too.
btw, i liked de concept of privatization of roads u had written abt in earlier post,though i had some apprehensions.hope u&#039;ll address them too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what u r saying abt de suffering of de classes is abt taxes in general.. and i&#8217;m wid u on that account.if u or neone can convince me that &#8220;men can never change earth to another venus&#8221;,i&#8217;d change my stance on carbon tax too.<br />
btw, i liked de concept of privatization of roads u had written abt in earlier post,though i had some apprehensions.hope u&#8217;ll address them too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpretentious Diva</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpretentious Diva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-656</guid>
		<description>The ice core data at votskov Russia is a valid scientific measure which even Al Gore cannot deny.
It cannot be denied because the same scientific measurement was used by catastrophe lovers to stress that there is Global Warming and other things.

See Gopi, its all false.
Men can never change Earth to other Venus even if they try to do so. Its in hands of nature.
About your support of carbon tax etc, Taxes are slavery, you can accept obedience to anyone by your own free-will its your right. You cannot and should not force others to accept the same by the use of force of government. let people choose. Why to force them?
&lt;strong&gt;
Why do you think you have more mind than others and they should accept your irrational ideas of catastrophe and apocalypse? &lt;/strong&gt;

Anyways you can keep living in your fears of catastrophe, the carbon taxes can force more poor to sacrifice their life for the madness of environmentalists, it wont make much difference on middle class and rich class. Government is looting middle class and rich class even now, a little more loot won&#039;t make big difference, actual sufferer will be the poor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ice core data at votskov Russia is a valid scientific measure which even Al Gore cannot deny.<br />
It cannot be denied because the same scientific measurement was used by catastrophe lovers to stress that there is Global Warming and other things.</p>
<p>See Gopi, its all false.<br />
Men can never change Earth to other Venus even if they try to do so. Its in hands of nature.<br />
About your support of carbon tax etc, Taxes are slavery, you can accept obedience to anyone by your own free-will its your right. You cannot and should not force others to accept the same by the use of force of government. let people choose. Why to force them?<br />
<strong><br />
Why do you think you have more mind than others and they should accept your irrational ideas of catastrophe and apocalypse? </strong></p>
<p>Anyways you can keep living in your fears of catastrophe, the carbon taxes can force more poor to sacrifice their life for the madness of environmentalists, it wont make much difference on middle class and rich class. Government is looting middle class and rich class even now, a little more loot won&#8217;t make big difference, actual sufferer will be the poor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gopi</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>gopi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-655</guid>
		<description>and what makes u think that de data presented by those who broke de &quot;myth&quot; is more credible than those presented by those who believe it&#039;s actually happening? did u personally verify the data? i do not know which side is right and which is wrong... it is quite possible that de ozone theory is a myth.. but what i do know is that all de chemicals and CFC&#039;s released won&#039;t do much good to life on earth. as long as u can prove w/o doubt it does&#039;nt harm neone/nething else, i hav no problems in firms making profits (i support it in fact).
and i&#039;d also request u to reply to my comment as a whole - not to certain parts of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and what makes u think that de data presented by those who broke de &#8220;myth&#8221; is more credible than those presented by those who believe it&#8217;s actually happening? did u personally verify the data? i do not know which side is right and which is wrong&#8230; it is quite possible that de ozone theory is a myth.. but what i do know is that all de chemicals and CFC&#8217;s released won&#8217;t do much good to life on earth. as long as u can prove w/o doubt it does&#8217;nt harm neone/nething else, i hav no problems in firms making profits (i support it in fact).<br />
and i&#8217;d also request u to reply to my comment as a whole &#8211; not to certain parts of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpretentious Diva</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-654</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpretentious Diva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-654</guid>
		<description>Lol Ozone Myth bubble was broken up in late 1990&#039;s in which world you are living Gopi?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol Ozone Myth bubble was broken up in late 1990&#8242;s in which world you are living Gopi?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gopi</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator>gopi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-653</guid>
		<description>@ diva
i agree wid u in most of ur other posts; but this is helluva lot of bull$#!+ to take in... what de environmentalists r saying is not to stop consuming energy.they just want energy to b produced in a way that does not harm de human race in de long run; a gradual shift from fossil fuels (86%) to renewable sources. i agree switching off lights for 1 hr worldwide doesnt make a difference; and that climate changes.. but the rate at which climate is changing unfavourably is increasing.i also agree that power is THE most important infrastructure needed for an economy to develop; but if climate changes at this rate (ozone layer holes), there won&#039;t BE an economy (or for that matter, a human race) to develop.a wise woodcutter never cuts the branch on which he is sitting!!
i&#039;m also against carbon taxes except IF the corpus collected is used for environment friendly measures (as promised) because we as individuals do not care abt negative externalities.what i mean to say is : why shud i suffer the UV rays bcoz u fly around in fancy jets that create the holes in ozone layer? isnt that against freedom and my right to life/property?
i&#039;m afraid i do not hav ne data to back up my claims that ozone layer is being depleted or that it is taking human lives...but i&#039;m sure u&#039;ll get enuf CREDIBLE data on the internet in this regard.
PS : just putting forward my views here.. no offence meant to neone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ diva<br />
i agree wid u in most of ur other posts; but this is helluva lot of bull$#!+ to take in&#8230; what de environmentalists r saying is not to stop consuming energy.they just want energy to b produced in a way that does not harm de human race in de long run; a gradual shift from fossil fuels (86%) to renewable sources. i agree switching off lights for 1 hr worldwide doesnt make a difference; and that climate changes.. but the rate at which climate is changing unfavourably is increasing.i also agree that power is THE most important infrastructure needed for an economy to develop; but if climate changes at this rate (ozone layer holes), there won&#8217;t BE an economy (or for that matter, a human race) to develop.a wise woodcutter never cuts the branch on which he is sitting!!<br />
i&#8217;m also against carbon taxes except IF the corpus collected is used for environment friendly measures (as promised) because we as individuals do not care abt negative externalities.what i mean to say is : why shud i suffer the UV rays bcoz u fly around in fancy jets that create the holes in ozone layer? isnt that against freedom and my right to life/property?<br />
i&#8217;m afraid i do not hav ne data to back up my claims that ozone layer is being depleted or that it is taking human lives&#8230;but i&#8217;m sure u&#8217;ll get enuf CREDIBLE data on the internet in this regard.<br />
PS : just putting forward my views here.. no offence meant to neone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpretentious Diva</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpretentious Diva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-652</guid>
		<description>Now its extreme high.

Listen Abhishek Beta,
1 million = 10 lacks .
15,600,000 square kilometers = 15.6 millions. That is the total area of land under ice is 15.6 million.
Of which 7% is known as permafrost. that is 1.05 square million of land is permafrost.
Whole permafrost is not melting away. A part of it is melting away, and a part is rebecoming permafrost.

So whatsoever permafrost is melting away, is very very less than even ONE MILLION. So, your statement itself is ridiculous that millions miles of permafrost is melting away.

Total area of permafrost is 1.05 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now its extreme high.</p>
<p>Listen Abhishek Beta,<br />
1 million = 10 lacks .<br />
15,600,000 square kilometers = 15.6 millions. That is the total area of land under ice is 15.6 million.<br />
Of which 7% is known as permafrost. that is 1.05 square million of land is permafrost.<br />
Whole permafrost is not melting away. A part of it is melting away, and a part is rebecoming permafrost.</p>
<p>So whatsoever permafrost is melting away, is very very less than even ONE MILLION. So, your statement itself is ridiculous that millions miles of permafrost is melting away.</p>
<p>Total area of permafrost is 1.05 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpretentious Diva</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpretentious Diva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-651</guid>
		<description>Lol.
The whore of environmentalist whorehouse came again to show up his madness.
148,939,100 sq.km , thats more than 1 million. 


&lt;h1 class=&quot;worksTitle&quot;&gt;How Much Of The Earth&#039;s Surface Is Covered With Ice?&lt;/h1&gt;

10.4% of total surface area of land is covered by ice,
that is 15,600,000 square kilometers, is covered with ice.
Of that 7% comes under Permafrost state.

Thats not one million, its pretty less babydoo!

And again same thing beta.

Melting of permafrost is an ancient process which keeps repeating again and again its unstoppable and no environmentalist can stop it anyhow.

No matters if you stop using your bike or scooter, no matters you stop using electricity, the discontinuous permafrost will melt.

Also, the discontinuous permafrost will expand again. Its cyclic.

And once more, The records of Permafrost region are only 30 years old, &lt;strong&gt;and they doesn&#039;t show any signs of global warming.&lt;/strong&gt;


But that is not the point of contention.

The debate is, these mad environmentalists, (like you abhishek, the whore of environmentalist&#039;s whorehouse) don&#039;t understand that their panicking attitude cannot change anything. It&#039;s not in man&#039;s hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol.<br />
The whore of environmentalist whorehouse came again to show up his madness.<br />
148,939,100 sq.km , thats more than 1 million. </p>
<h1 class="worksTitle">How Much Of The Earth&#8217;s Surface Is Covered With Ice?</h1>
<p>10.4% of total surface area of land is covered by ice,<br />
that is 15,600,000 square kilometers, is covered with ice.<br />
Of that 7% comes under Permafrost state.</p>
<p>Thats not one million, its pretty less babydoo!</p>
<p>And again same thing beta.</p>
<p>Melting of permafrost is an ancient process which keeps repeating again and again its unstoppable and no environmentalist can stop it anyhow.</p>
<p>No matters if you stop using your bike or scooter, no matters you stop using electricity, the discontinuous permafrost will melt.</p>
<p>Also, the discontinuous permafrost will expand again. Its cyclic.</p>
<p>And once more, The records of Permafrost region are only 30 years old, <strong>and they doesn&#8217;t show any signs of global warming.</strong></p>
<p>But that is not the point of contention.</p>
<p>The debate is, these mad environmentalists, (like you abhishek, the whore of environmentalist&#8217;s whorehouse) don&#8217;t understand that their panicking attitude cannot change anything. It&#8217;s not in man&#8217;s hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpretentious Diva</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpretentious Diva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 19:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-650</guid>
		<description>And then the coward idiot shouts &quot;&quot;&quot;Profanities&quot;&quot;&quot;.

Listen beta, No matters what you do, you cannot stop methane to get evolved again. Second thing is, even if you have had added Square to your bullshit, it could have not saved you.


&lt;h1 style=&quot;margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt 10px 1px;&quot;&gt;What is the total surface area of Earth?&lt;/h1&gt;

510,065,600 sq.km (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.answers.com/earth#Wikipedia%29&quot; title=&quot;http://www.answers.com/earth#Wikipedia)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.answers.com/earth#Wikipedia)&lt;/a&gt; of which 148,939,100 sq.km (29.2 %) is land and 361,126,400 km (70.8 %) is water.

Even that doesn&#039;t makes millions of permafrost getting melted.

Anyways it doesn&#039;t matters. What matters is, Methane is present and is being made regularly and is being decomposed too. it cannot be stopped. It is a natural process.
Fossils gets decomposed, and makes methane. After your death, when your bones and body will decompose in some graveyard, it will also make methane. Its unstoppable. A tree dies, and decomposes to many materials and gases of which methane is also a product. Any natural reaction between carbon and Hydrogen can make methane. &lt;strong&gt;No Human is needed for that.&lt;/strong&gt;

Second thing is, Permafrosts keeps melting, they keeps frozing again too. The records available are of only 30 years old. and they shows no sign of global warming.

Ahh but I know being a whore of environmentalist whorehouse, you won&#039;t understand simple english, and will shout profanity again.

But hey! I never mentioned that I am polite.
But you can&#039;t understand that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And then the coward idiot shouts &#8220;&#8221;"Profanities&#8221;"&#8221;.</p>
<p>Listen beta, No matters what you do, you cannot stop methane to get evolved again. Second thing is, even if you have had added Square to your bullshit, it could have not saved you.</p>
<h1 style="margin: 0pt; padding: 0pt 10px 1px;">What is the total surface area of Earth?</h1>
<p>510,065,600 sq.km (<a href="http://www.answers.com/earth#Wikipedia%29" title="http://www.answers.com/earth#Wikipedia)" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.answers.com/earth#Wikipedia" rel="nofollow">http://www.answers.com/earth#Wikipedia</a>) of which 148,939,100 sq.km (29.2 %) is land and 361,126,400 km (70.8 %) is water.</p>
<p>Even that doesn&#8217;t makes millions of permafrost getting melted.</p>
<p>Anyways it doesn&#8217;t matters. What matters is, Methane is present and is being made regularly and is being decomposed too. it cannot be stopped. It is a natural process.<br />
Fossils gets decomposed, and makes methane. After your death, when your bones and body will decompose in some graveyard, it will also make methane. Its unstoppable. A tree dies, and decomposes to many materials and gases of which methane is also a product. Any natural reaction between carbon and Hydrogen can make methane. <strong>No Human is needed for that.</strong></p>
<p>Second thing is, Permafrosts keeps melting, they keeps frozing again too. The records available are of only 30 years old. and they shows no sign of global warming.</p>
<p>Ahh but I know being a whore of environmentalist whorehouse, you won&#8217;t understand simple english, and will shout profanity again.</p>
<p>But hey! I never mentioned that I am polite.<br />
But you can&#8217;t understand that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpretentious Diva</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpretentious Diva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 19:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-649</guid>
		<description>Ohh so the son of whore was waiting to be spanked and tamed...lol.

Listen idiot, I know you are big-head and big-foot. By the fact of evolution, as the size of mind of human beings started decreasing, the analyzing and reasoning abilities of human started Increasing and humanity reached to the present state through stone age, iron age and medieval age etc.

Anyways, thats not the issue. Issue is, Methane is a greenhouse gas, issue is, without methane, life was impossible on earth. Issue is, as the quantity of methane increases, the temperature rises, The issue is, when Discontinuous Permafrost looses the shrink, methane evolves out, its discontinuous phenomena and it gets reversed too, &lt;strong&gt;and most Importantly, Human Beings have nothing to do with it.&lt;/strong&gt;

 &lt;em&gt;Now, when i say you that there are a million miles of strech containing permafrost which is melting, what will be your answer?&lt;/em&gt;

When and if you say such idiotic bakwaas, my answer wil be, that you are illiterate, try to open up 8th grade geography books and you will come to know the circumference of earth.


&lt;h2&gt;What is the circumference of the earth?&lt;/h2&gt;
The circumference of the earth at the equator is 24,901.55 miles (40,075.16 kilometers).
&lt;p&gt;But, if you measure the earth through the poles the circumference is a bit shorter - 24,859.82 miles (40,008 km). This the earth is a tad wider than it is tall, giving it a slight bulge at the equator. This shape is known as an ellipsoid or more properly, geoid (earth-like).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A part of earth is covered by icecapes, and a part is deepfrost, and a part is permafrost.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So if someone says that million miles are melting away, he is not talking of earth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And when did I denied that Discontinuous permafrost doesn&#039;t melts away?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Discontinuous permafrost keeps melting away and reviving again since the start of time.  Try to learn about &quot;time to form deep permafrost&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyways, its useless to expect you learning something.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So the thing is simple, permafrost do melts away, and again becomes visible, it is also a fact that cold season comes and goes, and further true fact is Cold Age comes and goes away. Methane plays its part but methane is also played by the environment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Being a environmentalist whore, you cannot stop methane, nor you can stop lakes and glaciars and discontinuous permafrost melt away. they are melting since ages and becoming again, methane is trapped and released again and again since ages and it will keep repeating. Human has no significant role in it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And one more thing, I don&#039;t care what whore-gang of environmentalists you belong too and what price they offer you for your show-ups, but I just don&#039;t belong to any Oil Company. That is not my line you know, I am an architect, not a chemical or metallurgical or hydrocarbon engineer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One last thing, read my previous answer to your bullshit again, permafrost records taken till now are just 30 years old, and they gives no idea of Global Warming. They just shows a fact, that Permafrost do melts away and again becomes visible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Enjoy!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohh so the son of whore was waiting to be spanked and tamed&#8230;lol.</p>
<p>Listen idiot, I know you are big-head and big-foot. By the fact of evolution, as the size of mind of human beings started decreasing, the analyzing and reasoning abilities of human started Increasing and humanity reached to the present state through stone age, iron age and medieval age etc.</p>
<p>Anyways, thats not the issue. Issue is, Methane is a greenhouse gas, issue is, without methane, life was impossible on earth. Issue is, as the quantity of methane increases, the temperature rises, The issue is, when Discontinuous Permafrost looses the shrink, methane evolves out, its discontinuous phenomena and it gets reversed too, <strong>and most Importantly, Human Beings have nothing to do with it.</strong></p>
<p> <em>Now, when i say you that there are a million miles of strech containing permafrost which is melting, what will be your answer?</em></p>
<p>When and if you say such idiotic bakwaas, my answer wil be, that you are illiterate, try to open up 8th grade geography books and you will come to know the circumference of earth.</p>
<h2>What is the circumference of the earth?</h2>
<p>The circumference of the earth at the equator is 24,901.55 miles (40,075.16 kilometers).</p>
<p>But, if you measure the earth through the poles the circumference is a bit shorter &#8211; 24,859.82 miles (40,008 km). This the earth is a tad wider than it is tall, giving it a slight bulge at the equator. This shape is known as an ellipsoid or more properly, geoid (earth-like).</p>
<p>A part of earth is covered by icecapes, and a part is deepfrost, and a part is permafrost.</p>
<p>So if someone says that million miles are melting away, he is not talking of earth.</p>
<p>And when did I denied that Discontinuous permafrost doesn&#8217;t melts away?</p>
<p>Discontinuous permafrost keeps melting away and reviving again since the start of time.  Try to learn about &#8220;time to form deep permafrost&#8221;.</p>
<p>Anyways, its useless to expect you learning something.</p>
<p>So the thing is simple, permafrost do melts away, and again becomes visible, it is also a fact that cold season comes and goes, and further true fact is Cold Age comes and goes away. Methane plays its part but methane is also played by the environment.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Being a environmentalist whore, you cannot stop methane, nor you can stop lakes and glaciars and discontinuous permafrost melt away. they are melting since ages and becoming again, methane is trapped and released again and again since ages and it will keep repeating. Human has no significant role in it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>And one more thing, I don&#8217;t care what whore-gang of environmentalists you belong too and what price they offer you for your show-ups, but I just don&#8217;t belong to any Oil Company. That is not my line you know, I am an architect, not a chemical or metallurgical or hydrocarbon engineer.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>One last thing, read my previous answer to your bullshit again, permafrost records taken till now are just 30 years old, and they gives no idea of Global Warming. They just shows a fact, that Permafrost do melts away and again becomes visible.</p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpretentious Diva</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpretentious Diva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-648</guid>
		<description>@Abhishek
The earth or nature gives no importance to all your idiotic save-earth programs. that&#039;s what is said in the article.

Now about permafrost, I know you have no sense of science and technology, as you have already disregarded man&#039;s potential to analyze the natural phenomenon.
So what is Permafrost? It is the soil remaining at or below the freezing point of water for 2 or more years.
Now there are &#039;continuous permafrost&#039; and &#039;discontinuous permafrost&#039;... many a times, just like solar waves, discontinuous permafrost also becomes a reason for higher temperatures, its a natural phenomenon, as discontinuous permafrost thaws, the methane and hydrocarbons gets a release in big amount which increases temperature and helps in further thawing of ice/soil. But it is discontinuous.

Now some jokers supporting global warming may consider permafrost as a sign of global warming bullshit. What they tries to hide is, they only have records from 30 years which are not only insufficient to proove any significance of man in changing the environment, but also, the records of permafrost are insufficient to show that there is actually any &quot;Significant&quot; raise in temperature.

Anyways, I would like to know how much the global warming jokers and PETA workers are paying for you?
I know you are acting like an agent of some big fraud environmentalist association trying their best to suggest madness of their cult environmentalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Abhishek<br />
The earth or nature gives no importance to all your idiotic save-earth programs. that&#8217;s what is said in the article.</p>
<p>Now about permafrost, I know you have no sense of science and technology, as you have already disregarded man&#8217;s potential to analyze the natural phenomenon.<br />
So what is Permafrost? It is the soil remaining at or below the freezing point of water for 2 or more years.<br />
Now there are &#8216;continuous permafrost&#8217; and &#8216;discontinuous permafrost&#8217;&#8230; many a times, just like solar waves, discontinuous permafrost also becomes a reason for higher temperatures, its a natural phenomenon, as discontinuous permafrost thaws, the methane and hydrocarbons gets a release in big amount which increases temperature and helps in further thawing of ice/soil. But it is discontinuous.</p>
<p>Now some jokers supporting global warming may consider permafrost as a sign of global warming bullshit. What they tries to hide is, they only have records from 30 years which are not only insufficient to proove any significance of man in changing the environment, but also, the records of permafrost are insufficient to show that there is actually any &#8220;Significant&#8221; raise in temperature.</p>
<p>Anyways, I would like to know how much the global warming jokers and PETA workers are paying for you?<br />
I know you are acting like an agent of some big fraud environmentalist association trying their best to suggest madness of their cult environmentalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rinzu</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator>rinzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-647</guid>
		<description>this issue needs to be addressed...

though for the next ten years global warming wont affect human lives...

so we have ten long years...!!!
to do a lot...!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this issue needs to be addressed&#8230;</p>
<p>though for the next ten years global warming wont affect human lives&#8230;</p>
<p>so we have ten long years&#8230;!!!<br />
to do a lot&#8230;!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stand Up</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>Stand Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 03:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-646</guid>
		<description>interesting post.  I was just thinking the other day, even trying to be more &quot;green&quot; it&#039;s as if practically everything has a con, besides the pro.  Even in the simplists of ways, for example, I was thinking about how much water is wasted just by using ice cubes.  We put some ice in a glass, fill it with soda or something, drink the soda, and leave the ice (except me because I am addicted to chewing on ice haha) so instead of wasting ice, we could just go buy bottles soda or beverages...but then you get the problem of more trash...instead of using a glass u can wash and re use, you now have to get rid of a plastic bottle.  sure it can be recycled, but not everyone recycles, and so we end up with more waste in our landfills, which we are running out of space for anyways...so its a viscious tradeoff, anyway.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; sure, the climate is changing, like you said it ALWAYS is...so what proves the source, and what proves the solution? what proves that we even need a solution??  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I think yeah, we need to change some of our wasteful ways.  and its a great motivation to bring new products to save and conserve energy on the market.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;but i dont think the world and humanity is going to fall apart and vanish from this so called global warming</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting post.  I was just thinking the other day, even trying to be more &#8220;green&#8221; it&#8217;s as if practically everything has a con, besides the pro.  Even in the simplists of ways, for example, I was thinking about how much water is wasted just by using ice cubes.  We put some ice in a glass, fill it with soda or something, drink the soda, and leave the ice (except me because I am addicted to chewing on ice haha) so instead of wasting ice, we could just go buy bottles soda or beverages&#8230;but then you get the problem of more trash&#8230;instead of using a glass u can wash and re use, you now have to get rid of a plastic bottle.  sure it can be recycled, but not everyone recycles, and so we end up with more waste in our landfills, which we are running out of space for anyways&#8230;so its a viscious tradeoff, anyway.  </p>
<p> sure, the climate is changing, like you said it ALWAYS is&#8230;so what proves the source, and what proves the solution? what proves that we even need a solution??  </p>
<p>I think yeah, we need to change some of our wasteful ways.  and its a great motivation to bring new products to save and conserve energy on the market.  </p>
<p>but i dont think the world and humanity is going to fall apart and vanish from this so called global warming</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unpretentious_diva</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>unpretentious_diva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 09:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-645</guid>
		<description>By &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/484868.stm&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt; Philip Stott&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;During the next few days, our media will suffer a collective bout of hypochondria over global warming and the future of the Earth. Why? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A cynic might say it is all the aircraft fuel burnt to carry the hundreds of delegates and journalists to Bonn, Germany, for the Fifth Session of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). But even this would be to accept the ecohype of the global warmers. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Why are we so surprised that climate is changing? Climate always changes. It would be newsworthy if climate stopped changing. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Slow and rapid changes&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;During the last 18,000 years there have been both gradual and abrupt changes, some much larger than any we are currently experiencing. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And what is the consensus about the present changes? A rise of between 0.3 and 0.6 degrees Centigrade during the last 150 years, although there has been cooling as well during this period. Some measures, such as those from corrected satellite readings, still indicate overall cooling. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;So why are we so desperate to criminalise human beings for this change? No single factor can account for climate variability. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Climate is governed by millions of factors, from the flip of a butterfly&#039;s wing, through volcanic eruptions, the oceans and natural greenhouse gases, to solar activity and meteors. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&#039;The biggest myth of all&#039;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The idea that climate change is brought about by just one or two factors, such as carbon dioxide emissions, is simply nonsense. We must grasp the fact that curbing human-induced greenhouse gases will not halt climate change. That is the biggest myth of them all. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My advice is therefore to ignore the hype. It will only make you unnecessarily anxious. Let them play with their inadequate climate models and come up with scenarios, the worse the better. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Instead, remember that humans have survived climate change for thousands of years, not by playing God with one or two politically selected factors, but by adapting to the new conditions, whether hot, cold, dry or wet. And, moreover, what about the opportunities global warming presents - far better than cooling any day! &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/484868.stm&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Philip Stott is Professor of Biogeography at the School of Oriental and African Studies in the University of London. &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By <a HREF="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/484868.stm" REL="nofollow"><b> Philip Stott<br /></b></a><br />During the next few days, our media will suffer a collective bout of hypochondria over global warming and the future of the Earth. Why? <br /><b><br />A cynic might say it is all the aircraft fuel burnt to carry the hundreds of delegates and journalists to Bonn, Germany, for the Fifth Session of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). But even this would be to accept the ecohype of the global warmers. </p>
<p>Why are we so surprised that climate is changing? Climate always changes. It would be newsworthy if climate stopped changing. </p>
<p>Slow and rapid changes</p>
<p>During the last 18,000 years there have been both gradual and abrupt changes, some much larger than any we are currently experiencing. </p>
<p>And what is the consensus about the present changes? A rise of between 0.3 and 0.6 degrees Centigrade during the last 150 years, although there has been cooling as well during this period. Some measures, such as those from corrected satellite readings, still indicate overall cooling. </p>
<p>So why are we so desperate to criminalise human beings for this change? No single factor can account for climate variability. </p>
<p>Climate is governed by millions of factors, from the flip of a butterfly&#8217;s wing, through volcanic eruptions, the oceans and natural greenhouse gases, to solar activity and meteors. </p>
<p>&#8216;The biggest myth of all&#8217;</p>
<p>The idea that climate change is brought about by just one or two factors, such as carbon dioxide emissions, is simply nonsense. We must grasp the fact that curbing human-induced greenhouse gases will not halt climate change. That is the biggest myth of them all. </p>
<p>My advice is therefore to ignore the hype. It will only make you unnecessarily anxious. Let them play with their inadequate climate models and come up with scenarios, the worse the better. </p>
<p>Instead, remember that humans have survived climate change for thousands of years, not by playing God with one or two politically selected factors, but by adapting to the new conditions, whether hot, cold, dry or wet. And, moreover, what about the opportunities global warming presents &#8211; far better than cooling any day! </b><br /><a HREF="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/484868.stm" REL="nofollow"><b><br />Philip Stott is Professor of Biogeography at the School of Oriental and African Studies in the University of London. </b></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unpretentious_diva</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>unpretentious_diva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 08:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-644</guid>
		<description>Surely it is not the case with me. &lt;br/&gt;I come above indoctrinations with critical questioning rational analyzing, Socratic methods and proper searching of my own self.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Your ignorance is nothing new. Being influenced on rational premises and being indoctrinated are different things. But, as usual you cannot understand it. There is no other way for human, but to use their mind. And If mind is what you want to corrupt by your illogical and irrational maddening ideas, then you can try, you may get a large success too, its nothing new, religionists, racists, mystiques communists socialists collectivists have ruled people and ruined lives and nature since long.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yet, you cannot stop the free-mind from thinking. And reason will make people realize the treachery the collectivistic ways you tend to teach.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Collectivism is always against Individuals. And a mother who teaches his child the collectivistic madness and indoctrinations, surely makes his life a hell.&lt;br/&gt;You have no concern about nature. You are hell bent to destroy nature. All your concerns are to rule people.&lt;br/&gt;Interdependence is no term, it is slavery.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Freedom is right to decide to get in or out of a mutual relation for mutual benefits. Any one who stresses that to live for other is necessity is criminal.&lt;br/&gt; Jesus? What he has to do with this?&lt;br/&gt;Again madness, about Dviata or Advita or Taitrriya Vedanta, its not the right place to discuss.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;As you have constantly shown that you are hell bent to destroy nature by your socialist/environmentalist philosophy, I assure you, the free spirit of Man will never let treacherous people like these socialist-environmentalist to do so. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I know when they get no rational premise to discuss with, they start talking nonsense. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Peace and free trade&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely it is not the case with me. <br />I come above indoctrinations with critical questioning rational analyzing, Socratic methods and proper searching of my own self.</p>
<p>Your ignorance is nothing new. Being influenced on rational premises and being indoctrinated are different things. But, as usual you cannot understand it. There is no other way for human, but to use their mind. And If mind is what you want to corrupt by your illogical and irrational maddening ideas, then you can try, you may get a large success too, its nothing new, religionists, racists, mystiques communists socialists collectivists have ruled people and ruined lives and nature since long.</p>
<p>Yet, you cannot stop the free-mind from thinking. And reason will make people realize the treachery the collectivistic ways you tend to teach.</p>
<p>Collectivism is always against Individuals. And a mother who teaches his child the collectivistic madness and indoctrinations, surely makes his life a hell.<br />You have no concern about nature. You are hell bent to destroy nature. All your concerns are to rule people.<br />Interdependence is no term, it is slavery.</p>
<p>Freedom is right to decide to get in or out of a mutual relation for mutual benefits. Any one who stresses that to live for other is necessity is criminal.<br /> Jesus? What he has to do with this?<br />Again madness, about Dviata or Advita or Taitrriya Vedanta, its not the right place to discuss.</p>
<p>As you have constantly shown that you are hell bent to destroy nature by your socialist/environmentalist philosophy, I assure you, the free spirit of Man will never let treacherous people like these socialist-environmentalist to do so. </p>
<p>I know when they get no rational premise to discuss with, they start talking nonsense. </p>
<p><b>Peace and free trade</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zorba</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>zorba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 08:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-643</guid>
		<description>!LOl!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;diva u r too sensitive about the capitalism and free trade and free mind and its amusing that u shouts against the indoctrination of mind as if it is not the case with u .&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I hope no great &quot;free&quot; inteligence is required to understand that what u cry over as indoctrination is human&#039;s mind ability to learn from others or getting influenced and simply there is no other way to operate .&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A child learns from his/her mother and whole life is a kid of process where one learns ,with clear choice to accept or reject what he is taught directly of indirectly .And for u to speak one&#039;s concern for nature is such a grave crime that       u simply are blind to see that individual spirit is not that much anti-colectivism.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Ok let me use another language ,Stephen r covey the writer of 7habits of highly effective people has used the right term &quot;inter-dependence&quot; which is the third stage after dependence and independence. A free man can be the only one who can be inter-dependent to reach goals unattainable for single free spirit and thus he opt to collect people which can come together and work for same goal .&lt;br/&gt;You accused me of being religious and further goes to claim that religion is against individual spirit but my lady it seems u don&#039;t meditate or read things with the very&quot; free spirit &quot;which u proclaim to support.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There is a incident in the life of jesus where he spoke to lady magdalane that &quot;he is alone who can love her&quot; and if i tell u to interpretate it i am sure you are going to cry over the fact that see how Christian are imposing collectivism through propaganda that jesus alone can love and save them but my dear if u intersect the statement u will unearth the meaning that jesus is alone stands for individual spirit as &quot;one who is free can love&quot; or one who is independent can go for inter-dependence . &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And i am stumped over the fact that how can u misunderstand me especially when u are so inteligent to write this great blog .&lt;br/&gt;I hope u know that this world is nothing but &quot;dvaita&quot; or duality  and to be blind for the other side of coin can prove fatal.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I must admit u write terrefic and i enjoy commenting &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;great love</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>!LOl!</p>
<p>diva u r too sensitive about the capitalism and free trade and free mind and its amusing that u shouts against the indoctrination of mind as if it is not the case with u .</p>
<p>I hope no great &#8220;free&#8221; inteligence is required to understand that what u cry over as indoctrination is human&#8217;s mind ability to learn from others or getting influenced and simply there is no other way to operate .</p>
<p>A child learns from his/her mother and whole life is a kid of process where one learns ,with clear choice to accept or reject what he is taught directly of indirectly .And for u to speak one&#8217;s concern for nature is such a grave crime that       u simply are blind to see that individual spirit is not that much anti-colectivism.</p>
<p>Ok let me use another language ,Stephen r covey the writer of 7habits of highly effective people has used the right term &#8220;inter-dependence&#8221; which is the third stage after dependence and independence. A free man can be the only one who can be inter-dependent to reach goals unattainable for single free spirit and thus he opt to collect people which can come together and work for same goal .<br />You accused me of being religious and further goes to claim that religion is against individual spirit but my lady it seems u don&#8217;t meditate or read things with the very&#8221; free spirit &#8220;which u proclaim to support.</p>
<p>There is a incident in the life of jesus where he spoke to lady magdalane that &#8220;he is alone who can love her&#8221; and if i tell u to interpretate it i am sure you are going to cry over the fact that see how Christian are imposing collectivism through propaganda that jesus alone can love and save them but my dear if u intersect the statement u will unearth the meaning that jesus is alone stands for individual spirit as &#8220;one who is free can love&#8221; or one who is independent can go for inter-dependence . </p>
<p>And i am stumped over the fact that how can u misunderstand me especially when u are so inteligent to write this great blog .<br />I hope u know that this world is nothing but &#8220;dvaita&#8221; or duality  and to be blind for the other side of coin can prove fatal.</p>
<p>I must admit u write terrefic and i enjoy commenting </p>
<p>great love</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unpretentious_diva</title>
		<link>http://www.reasonforliberty.com/globalwarming/the-catastrophe-lovers-want-to-return-to-dark-ages.html#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>unpretentious_diva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reasonforliberty.com/?p=80#comment-642</guid>
		<description>@zobra&lt;br/&gt;In fact, you are pre-occupied with the corrupt ideas thee socialist-environmentalism has fed you.&lt;br/&gt;It is nothing but &lt;b&gt;Anti-Human&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;br/&gt;First of all, Laissez-Faire means total removal of any governmental force from economic market.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;About indoctrinating minds of others, yes that&#039;s what these Anti-Humanists are doing, and not only now, but since always. First they used religion, then race, then caste, then class, and now environment; these are just excuses of these anti-humanists to control and rule over others.&lt;br/&gt;The thing is, despite of their all endeavors, they just cannot rule. Even &quot;killers&quot; like Stalin failed so, they are also not going to get any success.&lt;br/&gt;But what they actually will do is, they will harm the environment furthermore, and will take the situations to more weak zones.&lt;br/&gt;That CFL idea which you support, it clearly will increase the consumption of electricity.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There are various alternatives, install nuclear plants. When India tried to take starting steps, the Indian communists themselves opposed it.&lt;br/&gt;In reality they are self-confused that what actually they want.&lt;br/&gt;Market itself provides options. Man innovate options. Necessity creates discoveries and invention.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;i&gt;I would like to invoke the wisdom that says &quot;its all in mind&quot; and which goes to extent to say that mind is all what we need to train .In other words one can be taught to rise above the personal interest s and one can see in reality people operating with such wisdom .&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I know you are of the ilk who wants to indoctrinate minds and never let them free, you are against liberty and humanity. you are in fact against the Individual&#039;s ability to think and decide for himself too. That is why you used religion as your tool right at the first post and now again you came on same point.&lt;br/&gt;I know people trains terrorists too on same lines and yes some fools gets so much brainwashed that they even don’t flinch from blasting themselves.. It is as evil as that.&lt;br/&gt;These hoopla and Hype of Global warming is just a part of the strategy.&lt;b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It is degrading and shameful, it is anti-human.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I hope these socialists/environmentalists/communists may come over their madness to rule over others before they ruin this earth.&lt;br/&gt;You are blaming capitalism? No one will be ready to avoid DDT for your global warming hype. Because Global warming will come later, first mosquitoes will kill him with various illnesses like dengue/malaria etc.&lt;br/&gt;I wish Laissez-faire be applied before these socialists/communists/environmentalists may get any success in spreading their hypes.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Peace and Free trade and yes free-Independent Mind without any brainwashing and Indoctrination&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@zobra<br />In fact, you are pre-occupied with the corrupt ideas thee socialist-environmentalism has fed you.<br />It is nothing but <b>Anti-Human</b>.<br />First of all, Laissez-Faire means total removal of any governmental force from economic market.</p>
<p>About indoctrinating minds of others, yes that&#8217;s what these Anti-Humanists are doing, and not only now, but since always. First they used religion, then race, then caste, then class, and now environment; these are just excuses of these anti-humanists to control and rule over others.<br />The thing is, despite of their all endeavors, they just cannot rule. Even &#8220;killers&#8221; like Stalin failed so, they are also not going to get any success.<br />But what they actually will do is, they will harm the environment furthermore, and will take the situations to more weak zones.<br />That CFL idea which you support, it clearly will increase the consumption of electricity.</p>
<p>There are various alternatives, install nuclear plants. When India tried to take starting steps, the Indian communists themselves opposed it.<br />In reality they are self-confused that what actually they want.<br />Market itself provides options. Man innovate options. Necessity creates discoveries and invention.</p>
<p><i>I would like to invoke the wisdom that says &#8220;its all in mind&#8221; and which goes to extent to say that mind is all what we need to train .In other words one can be taught to rise above the personal interest s and one can see in reality people operating with such wisdom .</i></p>
<p>I know you are of the ilk who wants to indoctrinate minds and never let them free, you are against liberty and humanity. you are in fact against the Individual&#8217;s ability to think and decide for himself too. That is why you used religion as your tool right at the first post and now again you came on same point.<br />I know people trains terrorists too on same lines and yes some fools gets so much brainwashed that they even don’t flinch from blasting themselves.. It is as evil as that.<br />These hoopla and Hype of Global warming is just a part of the strategy.<b><br />It is degrading and shameful, it is anti-human.</b></p>
<p>I hope these socialists/environmentalists/communists may come over their madness to rule over others before they ruin this earth.<br />You are blaming capitalism? No one will be ready to avoid DDT for your global warming hype. Because Global warming will come later, first mosquitoes will kill him with various illnesses like dengue/malaria etc.<br />I wish Laissez-faire be applied before these socialists/communists/environmentalists may get any success in spreading their hypes.<br /><b><br />Peace and Free trade and yes free-Independent Mind without any brainwashing and Indoctrination</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

