Seriously… I tried to read this, but the grammar is so atrocious, I simply had to post this criticism before I leave. While I wish you the best of luck, perhaps an ESL tutor could help prepare your posts for publication in the future!

This is certainly useful as a system considering the fact that there are 6+ billion individuals.

The same identity crisis caused Britishers to attack new lands and colonize, same nationalism was behind the wars of spain, portugal, brtian france and germany, same identity problem caused WW1 and WW2, same Identity problem caused Indo-Pak most grevious wars, and problems of terrorism, militancy and mass murders, same sort of identity crisis is engulfing Gaza strip since ages.

That nationalism identity is the root cause of most mass murders of history and current era.

Don’t you know the reality?

No difference, I can not acclaim My Birth Right of Self Governance even now.

Stop showcasing your nationalism, I am Individualist totally against the collectivist idea of nationalism. Here there is no britisher no indian no american no pakistani, all are individuals, standing against any form of government and collectivism.

Although it is observable that If colonizers and socialists might not have interfered with Indian sub-continent, there might have been chances of capitalism and libertarianism fully develop in India after the down-fall of feudalism.

What india had were some butcherers like Aurangjebs, and then some impotents like bahadur Shah jafar.

if India lost to britishers it was Indian fault.

Oh right – I forgot – India was “discovered” by the Europeans

Or perhaps you mean India must feel fortunate for being “ruled” by the English?
Perhaps it is  the age old Choo-Choo Salute!

I hope it is not… that would be greatly disappointing

in fact child labor was not a problem in India until India lost economic freedom…

India never faced industrial revolution and medical revolution attacking Indian shores with such huge surge as Europe faced.

Just 15 years before industrial revolution, people were dying of small pox and malaria, and suddenly all those penicillin and quinine were discovered and the dangers of mass deaths in Europe ended, malaria and small pox and other such disease remained a masss murderer In India for long period, and were removed by british help alone.
But in Europe, during those times of starvation plague and medical discoveries, parents died in large numbers because they were never immuned, and their children remain healthy cos they got immunitions and vaccinations, the number of orphans increased manyfolds, and because of starvation and plagues nobody was there to take care.
Industrial revolution provided food and chance for life to those orphan children who might have have died of hunger and cold if there was no new work for them which was provided by Industrial revolution.

India must feel fortunate that indians got touch of Europeans at right time, And those orphans who were latter used by communists to stage a show against capitalism and industrial revolution, and who might have died if there was not capitalism which saved their life, should be considered Lucky.

Child Labour is not Indian problem alone, Europe faced the blames of child labor majorly after industrial revolution.

That’s exactly the point… the issue is polity… European polity… in fact child labor was not a problem in India until India lost economic freedom…

the word victim – you obviously misinterpreted the meaning

me a pessimist? that’s a first for me.. but I’ll take it

yet are a victim to the compulsions of finding a perfect design…

I am not victim, nor I am for any compulsion of perfection, also I don’t consider a perfectionist as a victim, rather the perfectionist is the prime mover towards betterment, he is the source of evolution. You seem to be pessimist I guess.

About topdown paradigm, I do not think that you are clear about it.
Child Labour is not Indian problem alone, Europe faced the blames of child labor majorly after industrial revolution.
Just like molestation, certain works surely are dangerous for a child psyche, certain works surely need a consent from an able mind, and for such works, a child cannot and should not be forced. That is the idea. If you want me to give some examples, i can provide, yet I assume that you can get the examples of those certain works by yourself.

Maria Montessori roused against Hitler and defied him against forcing her young kid students to serve in German army.

…that’s exactly what freedom means… can you really say you are free if someone follows up with a question “wait… what you are doing with your freedom?”

so the question of say, child labor at home vs. at a factory – is an issue of a flawed polity – not failure of society…

Indic polity achieved industrial success in a decentralized structure… workers were self employed… with the family being the primary “help…” in this environment – a social conflict is not relevant… yet when the system crumbled – as Indians lost their economic freedom, it became an issue… a social issue as well… but can the solution be acheived if you look at the social problem in isolation?

Christianity and later progressive-liberalism was unleashed on India to “expose” India’s “social” ills – when in reality they were a result of loss of economic and political freedom… that was a distraction…

So if someone wants to address the “problem” of child labor – challenge the flawed polity… challenge a bad constitution… 

…the progressive-liberal paradigm creates a distraction from finding the real solutions to freedom…

…I acknowledge that you do make an attempt to change the point of view, yet are a victim to the compulsions of finding a perfect design… that’s the paradox…

As far as my views are concerned…I believe that once we are independent we should be left on our own. Parents toil for us for their whole life (am assuming that we a re lucky to have great parents). They don’t have to pay up for us for the whole life.