Mumbai, Girls were molested just after new years party by a mob of literate young people.
Patna, Young literate Medical college boys tried to molest the girls in the hostel of medical college.
Kerala, a young guy with his gang molested a tourist girl from Europe in front of her father who was being interviewed by some reporters of media.
Sure, it is breakdown of moral policing, showing complete disregard of Individual rights, respect and self-esteem. Such situations are shameful where women are not even free to live peacefully in a college hostel, in a metro city of India, and in a communist state well known as Gods own Land. Is moral policing is of any use until the Individuals’ are not ready to understand the reason, purpose and importance of self-esteem?
Moral Policing in India is always extreme, yet it is useless. Why human cannot understand the meaning and importance of freedom for his own self and for others? Will the mob that molested the girls, feel good if some other mob starts tormenting them? Why they cry when Bajrang Dal or SIMI starts acting erratic against such people, why no human rights activist or the so-called communist and socialist moral inspectors are not ready to take responsibilities of such behaviours? If girls cannot feel safe in a reputed medical Colleges premises in their own hostel and their own rooms, then how can one demand the girls to get out of their hidden homes for self-improvement and education? If the bastards cannot respect the tourists, then why they hope for the benefits they get from tourism.
More importantly, if Indian society and police is not able to protect human rights in general, then what is the use of such biased and ill definition of free nation?
If some bastards make a mob and molests girls walking on road, then it is NOT My or YOUR Fault. If the girls in a hostel of Medical College of Patna are attacked by the boozed up mob of medical students of boy’s hostel, and police denies or ignores taking responsibility to safeguard the girls and provide security, and leaves them for suffering the fear and torture, then MONSTER is not you or ME or those GIRLS. If a boozed-up mentally-ill sex-maniac attack the Tourist and her daughter on road in front of the reporters and reporters fail in safeguarding the tourist and girl then it is not Me or that tourist and his daughter who is monster, the monster is that bastard who although got literacy but never got any education, neither from his family, his mother and father, nor from his school and his so-called saviour socialist/communist society.
Till how long these criminals will be left free on the wrong and corrupt basis of Monstrosity? The crime signifies that there are monsters in the society who are snatching the Individual rights. The Government is to safeguard the Individual rights. If Government cannot take responsibility, then it must provide ways for the intellect to raise issues of improving moral standards of the MONSTERS which is neither you nor me but the society. Until we do not establish the importance of Individual, her liberty and her Individual right to live, and live free, one cannot secure the individual rights anyhow. Funny thing is those monsters are only those for whom I pay taxes. Who is not monster, the police, which ignored the responsibility to reach the girls-hostel under attack by boy students to safeguard the girls? Are the leaders who keep on fulfilling their ministry accounts but never provide any security for the Individual freedom and her right to be free not criminals? Who keep on and on to provide useless reservations to promote useless literacy but never educates any single person of the society? The media, which is so useless that it can create no stream of fresh life in the subtly dying morality of the Irrational Individuals of the mobs, is not the media a criminal. The socialist thinkers who never tries to strengthen the Individuality and promote the sense of Heroism in the Individual so that even One Individual may provide evidential reason for the whole mob to believe that Individual rationale ethical strength and strong honesty towards life is NOT that Impossible, that the Monster hidden in our society is NOT intractable?
They all are Monsters, Not me. I deny taking any responsibility of their Monstrosity. I Accept My Responsibility to never to act any immoral any irrational activity in my whole Life. Neither I will let them threaten and suppress me, nor I will anyhow support their Monstrosity in anyway. I reject their Monstrosity!
But then they says that if you are moralist and so rational, I think it is your duty to stop wrong things happening…and that is the responsibility of the society as whole to stop wrong things happening…. I wonder why will they or anybody else decide my duty and on what rational basis? Am I their slave? The First moral reasonably sound principle is Happiness, my happiness. My virtue is Honest; selfish, virtuous dignified life on rationale moral standards. My stand is I will never be a part of slave society who prays the monsters just because they are a part of the monster ship!
Decide your own path reasonably, use your mind and follow your responsibility. Do not wait for some Krishna, Ram, Karl Marx, or Gandhi to come again to safeguard your dignity, be that much able that you may lead a strong ethical morally sound honest Independent free life for your own self. Demand your freedom for your own self and win it.
If you have weakness in understanding the basic principles and rights of individual including his/her property rights, then it is not my fault. Society is for Individual, not the other way round. If society starts demanding sacrifices from individual, then it is crap society! You may keep enjoying sacrificing your blood and honest hard-work sweat, I will NEVER! I will never let any of my worth full moment of life for any benefit of that monstrous society which demands sacrifices from the Individual!
No one can promote an individual to think for reason purpose and self-esteem.
The Individual have to gain it by himself. Rama can be morally strong; he cannot make others be morally strong. Others can be strong by themselves only. Nevertheless, they are as victims as they are criminals. They say the monster are we, they say the immoral is we, and they let it live because nothing can be perfect. May be they likes it, I reject it. Collectivism brings good, collectivism brings bad. For the greed of good, they accepts the bad, they sacrifices themselves for the short good collectivism can bring, that is wrong. Leave collectivism, think of your own moral good, and provide examples. Provide moral heroes independent of the society independent of the monster. Those examples will make further ten heroes.