In December 2008, at the U.N. Global Warming conference in Poznan, Poland, 650 of the world’s top climatologists stood up and said fabricated global warming is a media generated myth without basis. The Chairman of the International Geological Congress, climatologist Dr. David Gee said,

“For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming?”¹

Ohh yes, despite all Global Warming cries, World is cooling down.
We discussed about the myths of Global Warming earlier here.
In the late 90′s there were speculations that Carbon Emission is causing Global Warming. There were enough speculations to support it
1> Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, it’s a proven fact.
2> Global warming is being observed since decades and atmospheric carbon concentration is also rising.
3> There is no other plausible reason for global warming.
Thus this jigsaw puzzle speculated that human are responsible² they should be guilty, sad, worried and they should now sacrifice.

Since carbon emission is causing global warming, hence coal mines should be closed, petroleum usage should be dropped, business and production should be kept at a halt. People should wither in cold, dark and hunger, but it is a sacrifice, sacrifice for a greater cause, and cause is to save the earth against global warming.
How anti-human, anti-poor governments can become to save earth? Also, governments have a dream to eliminate poverty too, how? By killing poor, and destroying away means of production?
Kyoto protocol was proposed in 1997 and Indian government jumped signing on it, why? Was it because India is first and foremost while worrying for the globe, its warming and protection? Ohh yes, India and Indians are meant to sacrifice.
Or was it because government wanted to put up a limit against the common citizen to grow by his endeavors, innovation and enterprising abilities? Kyoto protocol “assumed” that carbon emission causes global warming, hence the nations should restrict the carbon emission. Thus, government had a reason to license and control industries, business and production. Yet, it was all wrong.

1>In 2003, scientific data started showing that carbon emission has nothing to do with global warming. From 1940 to 1975, the earth cooled while atmospheric carbon increased.
2>In 2004, the temporal resolution of ice core data showed that in past warming events of History, the temperature increases generally started about 800 years before the rises in atmospheric carbon. That is, global warming had nothing to do with carbon emission rates. If carbon emission has nothing to do with global warming, are hot girls causing global warming?
In this new decade at the end of 2008, again new scientific data are out showing there is No Global Warming.
3>Earth saw its height of temperature in 1998, since then the temperature is falling, in 2007, the temperature dropped extremely and in 2008, it reached the 1980 levels.

So global temperatures are decreasing fast, while CO2 is increasing fast, how can it be true? CO2 must warm the globe, but that is not happening.
The temporal resolution data at Vostok Russia shows that Holocene period of warmth is over, and now we are entering in Ice Age. Ohh Al Gore where are you.

Obama is hell-bent to introduce carbon emission tax in America. No doubt, Indian government and other world’s government will follow the suit. They will waste millions of rupees and dollars of tax payer’s money in ‘innovating’ new ways to produce power.
So why government ignores the real fact and why government try to make the myth of ‘global warming’ a reality when the scientific data shows the globe is cooling.
Chancellor of Japan’s Institute of Science and technology, Dr. Kunihiko says,

“CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or the other … every scientist knows this, but it doesn’t pay to say so.”³

Is it so difficult to guess the answer?
We discussed the solution of poverty here properly, to reduce poverty; we need to increase production, production in all spheres. Yet how it will be possible if governments are hell-bent to control industries, factories and enterprises by fixing carbon emissions, taxing on it? The answer lies in the madness of egalitarians, socialists and communists. They know that by collective measures and governmental control, they cannot reduce poverty, because they are against progress, against production. Since they cannot increase the production ability of poor, they want to decrease the production ability of rich and able, and their idea is to distribute it in poor.
The same old Robin Hood the looter idea, loot rich, feed poor. I wonder why couldn’t Robin Hood started producing wealth and richness and then voluntarily spread it in poor, lazy beggars. Government is just like Robin Hood. Government cannot produce wealth, politicians cannot create employment, it cannot innovate, and it cannot feed poor for always. It cannot make them work too.
Yet, do the government cares for poor?
It is the dilemma of central politics and government controlled economy, it is counterintuitive, discriminatory on wrong grounds, anti-productive, and unjust.
All environmental laws and carbon emission taxes will restrict rich capitalists from making more money. Will it affect them? No, they are already rich. So whom will it affect? It will affect the poor, who needs job and work, who need to increase his productivity so that he may feed his wife and children well, he may save some money to make his children learn. He needs capitalists to install new industries, factories and mills and increase production.
Similarly, Minimum wages laws, whom do they help?
Minimum wages law forces people to discriminate on religion and caste and hence divides the society on irrational premises. If an employer need to employ two workers, and government has fixed the minimum wages limits. Then he has no incentive to choose that worker who gets ready to work for lesser salary and in that case, the employer has no incentive to employ a person of other caste or race or religion. Why won’t he employ the person of his own caste, race and religion?
In absence of minimum wage law though, the employer will have to choose that worker who is ready to work at lower salary irrespective of his religion, caste or race.

Similarly, laws against “child labor” benefit the relatively well off at the expense of the needy. A person from middle class or lower middle class may not like his children to work. Yet, how will a poor child survive if his parents are not able to feed him? He needs to work, may be he need to feed his ill-mother.
The world is not perfect, and the more government tries to make it perfect, the more it becomes worse. The best way for government to help poor is let them increase their productivity, and that is possible only if government keeps away from economic sector completely.

Disclaimer: I agree with the Idea that we should not pollute the environment. I don’t think there is anyone out there that wants dirty air or water. The problem I have is that we as Indians are asked to NOT to try to better our life style, we are suggested to sacrifice our right to get better water, better air, and all this on pure lies. It makes no sense that government in order to reduce carbon emission start subsidizing ethanol/oil rich crops and promote GM crops. I know their intentions may not be wrong, but their policies, are simply wrong and anti-poor, anti-progress and anti-human. It makes no sense that India slows down its industrial progress just for the sake of maintaining carbon emission rates, because some skeptic scientists believe that CO2 is causing warming, while the facts says, Globe is cooling up fast.

1. (source), www.mlive.com [↩]
2. Jigaw Puzzle,Techshout [↩]
3. (source), www.mlive.com [↩]