Before this economic crash, America’s economy was doing quite well but the adiministration was quite unpopular.

Since you do not have knowledge and facts doesn’t mean that truths are not providing facts.

India and Pakistan were in recession in 1999, kargil war happened, Indian government is always blamed that it had proper knowledge of Pakistan insurgency and infilteration, but it didn’t take action to stop it, and forced India to go to war. it is a fact.
Also, even during recent Mumbai attacks, Indian Intelligence blames government that it provided excellent information about some attacks being planned, but government never heeded and there were no security plans. What do you think of continuous blame game of failure of intelligence by government and counterblame by intelligence departments of failure of central and state governments to use the provided informations? Its just illusive blame game.

2> in 2000-2001 America was in deep recession. Iraq war took place. Osama was one of best friend of USA government, US government was providing business plans and deals to Osama and his family, suddenly he became enemy in recession. its a fact nooone can deny.

3> current recession is going on since 2006. its not new thing, its effects are visible now in most expresive way. and it is the middle of recession, it will go on till 3 more years as US and european experts says. We Austrian experts says until government won’t leave interference in economy, crisis will sustain and keep coming in going out in cycles. such cycles are called cycle of boom and burst.

The article i wrote is well backed up and facts have been linked.

Military Keynesianism is a state policy backed up by every european american asian mixed economy state. it is a fact.

2> baby it is backed up by facts. It is the major point of keynesianism.
Just that you are not able to grasp it.
Was cold war not backed up by most of European states, America, Russia, China, Pakistan and on unheard notes, by India?
Wasn’t it the case of fist world, second world and third world? It is a fact you cannot deny.
Weren’t the elements you are complaining of created by states? Haven’t Indian state created similar sort of Elements? Isn’t RAW supporting militancy in Pakistan?
What facts you have that ISI is supporting rouge elements? isn’t ISI a state organization?

Ostrich remains Ostrich.

2) Your thesis that nation-states indulge in warfare to stave off recession due to misguided economic systems is not backed up by facts. The nations of Europe and Japan were/are in recession for long periods, but are among the most pacifist of nations. America is a tricky case, but the bottom line is that wars have made American administrations less and not more popular, even during times of economic gain. Before this economic crash, America’s economy was doing quite well but the adiministration was quite unpopular.

Also, as heavy taxation employed to fund the military and armed forces which so far have not been observed in INDIA.

Well buddy you haven’t observed doesn’t mean it does exist. Taxation may not only mean direct taxes, but indirect taxes too(sales tax, VAT, duties cess etc)
Another way for the govt to make money is revenues extracted by the monopolistic and non-monopolistic trade ventures like Indian Railways(Govt Monopoly), and BSNL(non-Monopoly, but receiving favors from govt and having access to govt treasury for investment).
In addition to that govt can always print more money, borrow more money against our future generations etc etc(can be observed through inflation).

So when you say “it has not been observed” you gotta make sure you covered all the aspects you can observe. Coz to fund the war the govt needs money from somewhere, there is no magic involved lemme assure that.

One thing you can always observe, the inflation always runs high during a war, the govt wants to make you believe that since its a war the demand for commodities is higher, but its bullshit, govt is simply expanding the money supply like crazy.

It doesn’t matter, war or no war, India is increasing the spending, the wasteful spending which will help nobody.

Also, there can surely be issues of Political power. But the essay is about discussing the Mixed Government Controlled Economy, its meaning, its evil ways, and ideas to help people. Its not about indian or pakistan or us or uk government, its about any mixed economy or totalitarian government.

And after that, to improve Indian economy, Indian government started increasing Military spendings. The disease is contagious, that is why it is called race of weapons.
Furthermore,you will notice that india denied that “extra cheese” after indo-pak war (that is another fact that India was not in position to control pak area). But after the war, by imposing emergency, Indira Gandhi did controlled and revamped economy completely, and increased military spendings to further high.

So War, if  Resources gained after war > Spending on the war

Pakistan is in it for a long haul and not to mere bring in any increase in spending to pep up the economy but to win over the power struggle that started the day Brithshers left our shores..

I agree that Pakistan acted under US/CIA, and my essay coverrs the cold war too. The jihadi groups thus produced by CIA/ISI against soviets were also motivated by same Military Keynesianism.
I agree that Pak politicians gives a heck about economics, but they do care about their allies who are not so ignorant (America, China. if pak keeps on and on, America gets its market., Keynesian economics do well in there.
About Indian politicians, they are not that fool, we have got a stream of Keynesians Since the times of Indira Gandhi.
And well the essay covers, whole world, it is not specifically about Indo-pak situation. When we talk of Military keynesianism, we cover off China, India, UK, USA, Pakistan, Russia, Israel too. Other nations also just cannot avoid its effect.

i agree that militarinomics of the keynesian variety is bulls***.
i would have give some credence to your theory if the pakistan miltary had a military industrial complex -ofcourse not.they import all the equipment and their aim is not to produce employment. rather it is simple the effects of a failed state dictated by theocratic concern. i wonder how pakistan can be called a democracy when its constitution officially recognizes it as a moslem state.