wow! just awesome review of a real good book
i m gonna buy this one.

Well this book is not for print under any major publisher, its independently published by lulu.com if you live in India it will be cheaper for you to get a printout yourself(its 65 pages only), or just read it on the computer.
Personally I prefer the audiobook version because Stefan read it himself and he literally makes it live.

one similar word is “Anarchism alias Naxalism”!

he is merely saying “that which others call evil – my self-interest – is good for me.”

its all because thesew naxalites/anarchists don’t believe that they are doing any wrong by stealing other’s ideas intellectual property, that they keep using similar words and thinks that they have said even a morsel of any new idea or fact.
Virtue of selfishness is well-established idea which every individual realizes and acdcepts because there is nothing which can oppose it.

Well pretty much everything you do in your life which involves the mutual consent of both the parties is everyday anarchy. You go to a bookshop and buy a book, that’s called anarchy.

the most idiotic part whole post.
when will you realize that it is not anarchy but Volluntary Action which defies nobodys rights.
Anarchy/Naxalism is what they do when they start attacking individual premise and freedom of other free individuals.
They do so for their hunt of irresonsible and non-volluntary hunger of power.

Ayn Rand school of thought which hovers dangerously around the borderline between the belief of her word as a command rather than her ideas as a right way of thinking. The borderline between a philosophy and a cult.

The state never teaches any of its “subjects” the virtue of anarchism. Just like we cannot expect a Islamic madarassa to teach the virtue of infidels, we can surely expect an organization whose sole purpose is the most optimized usage of force for maximum benefit of people and its own survival, to teach the virtue of anarchism.

lol,  I wonder why do you feel that you need to keep attacking on Ayn Rand for stating your ideas (wrong) ideas of anarchism.

No matters its your property or George Bush’s property, if you abduct my sister and keep her forcibly there, I will certainly reach there to safegaurd and rescue her, although being an anarcist/naxalite, you can keep shouting that I am infringing your right to property.
If I am sure you have abducted her, I will enter and rescue her, and in doing so, I may kil you too, it will be self-defense, I may get killed too, that will also e self-defence on your part.
no government nor anarchy is required for that.
If some Ravana will abduct Sita, Ram will attack the golden palace of Ravana irrespective of all his property rights.

What is “Everyday Anarchy”?
an illuded idea about free-society where the writer wrongly put up volluntary-conduct of free-individuals as anarchist action.

Book has nothing wrong, it has nothing new, the only problem is, the book is a try to claim anarchy/naxalism as righteous on the name of free-volluntary-conduct of individuals.
“Oh sex without consent (rape) is outright wrong”
same mistake again.

it is not anarchist idea that “sex without consent is wrong”, it is free-volluntary concept, it is sense of equality. Anarchist even don’t know the meaning of “consent”.

Your mom telling you to wash your clothes is not anarchy.

you writing in this blog is also not anarchy.
it is your free-volluntary action.

same way a mother telling her son to wash his cloths, or have a bathe, or brush his teeth, is not anarchy, it is mothers free-volluntary-action.

She is not forcing her son nor she can. She can make her son realize the importance of washed up cloths, brushed teeth and bathing. If the son realizes it, he will accept the advice, otherwise, mother is not responsible in anyway even if her son dies of illness because of lack of hygiene.
Irrespective of her new-borne child is dying of hunger, if a mother goes round parties completely irresponsible of the child and leaves him to die as a result of negligience, then it is neither selfsihness, nor virtue, but it is anarchy, it is savagery, it is madness.

Anarchy is just opposite of reasonability and responsible attitude.
It has nothing to do with government or no-government, it is a sickness of some people who considers that they have no responsibility whatsoever towards anybody.

as a matter of objective fact, nobody holds any duty, any responsibility towards another, but one do holds the responsibility of his own actions.
it is your freedom to work for someone or not to work, if you mutually took a volluntary-mutually profitable contract decisiopn, there is your responsibility to follow and respect the contract, you will have freedom to break the contract, but it will have aforementioned procedure.
but as a man, if with a girl you decide to procreate, and after having her pregnant, if you feel like you don’t want child, or you want to break, than it is irresponsible and wrong attitude (but it is anarchist).
same way, if the mother after giving birth to child, doesn’t feel her responsibility towards the baby, then it is wrong. It is neither selfish act.
Because a selfish man/woman properly takes responsibility of his/her actions, a selfish girl won’t give birth to a child if she don’t want to or feel unable to care for the child in future.
anyways, I wish yopu and your “anarchist-cult” people prohibit using examles of “volluntary-mutually-beneficial-actions” as anarchism/naxalism.
Opposing government, denying government is another thing, but opposing organized living, opposing selfishly acclaimed natural objective laws is madness.